[User-committee] Request for Log Working Group
Rochelle Grober
rochelle.grober at huawei.com
Wed Feb 8 00:09:29 UTC 2017
Thanks all!
The tracks (one BoF and one Working session) have been submitted. I added as co-speakers those who have expressed desire, commitment and bodies for the effort. I am hoping to hand off leadership to these newly energized folks while providing the history, pitfalls and lessons learned.
--Rocky
From: Melvin Hillsman [mailto:mrhillsman at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 12:59 PM
To: Jimmy Mcarthur <jimmy at tipit.net>
Cc: user-committee at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [User-committee] Request for Log Working Group
We (OSIC) will be participating in the discussion and recently were discussing the WGs status with another WG if that is any consolation.
--
Melvin Hillsman
Ops Technical Lead
OpenStack Innovation Center
mrhillsman at gmail.com<mailto:mrhillsman at gmail.com>
phone: (210) 312-1267<tel:(210)%20312-1267>
mobile: (210) 413-1659<tel:(210)%20413-1659>
Learner | Ideation | Belief | Responsibility | Command
http://osic.org<http://osic.org/>
On Feb 7, 2017, at 13:37, Jimmy Mcarthur <jimmy at tipit.net<mailto:jimmy at tipit.net>> wrote:
Got it. I've notified Rocky and given her permissions to add her WG submission.
Thanks for the guidance!
Jimmy
Edgar Magana<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>
February 7, 2017 at 10:23 AM
Jimmy,
It seems that we have a good engagement for this WG. I will advocate for allocating space during the Summit if possible.
Thanks,
Edgar
From: Jimmy McArthur <jimmy at openstack.org><mailto:jimmy at openstack.org>
Date: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 7:28 AM
To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org"<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org> <user-committee at lists.openstack.org><mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [User-committee] Request for Log Working Group
Hi all -
The request below came into speaker support and we need to address. However, I don't know if this is an active WG or not. Can anyone clarify?
Cheers!
Jimmy
Rochelle.Grober<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__openstack.zendesk.com_agent_-23_users_455296376&d=DwMCAw&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=y_c_LUSDOcmJ-BHKLHo5Ghl1o2w99uWe8Abcx9l5cqE&s=v028PK6SPKtVonKhCh76n4FIHs4NP5H4QakNBVbOkLg&e=>Friday 17:36
Hi.
I am the Co-chair for the moribund Log Working group. I am resurrecting it and will be handing it over to a diverse team of DevOps who have committed to move forward with logging improvements via PWG, specs, and implementation. But, I can't submit a WG/Team request because I the WG is not "active." At least I think that is the reason. Unless I’m just supposed to title it Working Group/Team Space and pick presentation and and Arch&Ops and explain our need in the summary section. I’m not sure.
We have a formal session (and likely informal ones) scheduled for the Ops meetup in Milan. We would like to continue the momentum by meeting for more F2F progress at the Boston summit.
If you could help, it would be appreciated.
Thanks,
--Rocky
_______________________________________________
User-committee mailing list
User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
Jimmy McArthur<mailto:jimmy at openstack.org>
February 7, 2017 at 9:28 AM
Hi all -
The request below came into speaker support and we need to address. However, I don't know if this is an active WG or not. Can anyone clarify?
Cheers!
Jimmy
Rochelle.Grober<https://openstack.zendesk.com/agent/#/users/455296376>Friday 17:36
Hi.
I am the Co-chair for the moribund Log Working group. I am resurrecting it and will be handing it over to a diverse team of DevOps who have committed to move forward with logging improvements via PWG, specs, and implementation. But, I can't submit a WG/Team request because I the WG is not "active." At least I think that is the reason. Unless I’m just supposed to title it Working Group/Team Space and pick presentation and and Arch&Ops and explain our need in the summary section. I’m not sure.
We have a formal session (and likely informal ones) scheduled for the Ops meetup in Milan. We would like to continue the momentum by meeting for more F2F progress at the Boston summit.
If you could help, it would be appreciated.
Thanks,
--Rocky
_______________________________________________
User-committee mailing list
User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
_______________________________________________
User-committee mailing list
User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20170208/dd099ef0/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the User-committee
mailing list