Open Stack

Thanks! will submit today. will coordinate with lcoo, pwg, public cloud providers, etc.

--Rocky

Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice
From:Jimmy Mcarthur
To:Edgar Magana
Cc:user-committee
Date:2017-02-07 11:38:33
Subject:Re: [User-committee] Request for Log Working Group

Got it. I've notified Rocky and given her permissions to add her WG submission.

Thanks for the guidance!
Jimmy

Edgar Magana<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>
February 7, 2017 at 10:23 AM
Jimmy,

It seems that we have a good engagement for this WG. I will advocate for allocating space during the Summit if possible.

Thanks,

Edgar

From: Jimmy McArthur <jimmy at openstack.org><mailto:jimmy at openstack.org>
Date: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 7:28 AM
To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org"<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org> <user-committee at lists.openstack.org><mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [User-committee] Request for Log Working Group

Hi all -

The request below came into speaker support and we need to address. However, I don't know if this is an active  WG or not. Can anyone clarify?

Cheers!
Jimmy
Rochelle.Grober<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__openstack.zendesk.com_agent_-23_users_455296376&d=DwMCAw&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=y_c_LUSDOcmJ-BHKLHo5Ghl1o2w99uWe8Abcx9l5cqE&s=v028PK6SPKtVonKhCh76n4FIHs4NP5H4QakNBVbOkLg&e=>Friday 17:36


Hi.

I am the Co-chair for the moribund Log Working group. I am resurrecting it and will be handing it over to a diverse team of DevOps who have committed to move forward with logging improvements via PWG, specs, and implementation. But, I can't submit a WG/Team request because I the WG is not "active." At least I think that is the reason. Unless I’m just supposed to title it Working Group/Team Space and pick presentation and and Arch&Ops and explain our need in the summary section. I’m not sure.

We have a formal session (and likely informal ones) scheduled for the Ops meetup in Milan. We would like to continue the momentum by meeting for more F2F progress at the Boston summit.

If you could help, it would be appreciated.

Thanks,
--Rocky

_______________________________________________
User-committee mailing list
User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
Jimmy McArthur<mailto:jimmy at openstack.org>
February 7, 2017 at 9:28 AM
Hi all -

The request below came into speaker support and we need to address. However, I don't know if this is an active  WG or not. Can anyone clarify?

Cheers!
Jimmy

Rochelle.Grober<https://openstack.zendesk.com/agent/#/users/455296376>Friday 17:36


Hi.

I am the Co-chair for the moribund Log Working group. I am resurrecting it and will be handing it over to a diverse team of DevOps who have committed to move forward with logging improvements via PWG, specs, and implementation. But, I can't submit a WG/Team request because I the WG is not "active." At least I think that is the reason. Unless I’m just supposed to title it Working Group/Team Space and pick presentation and and Arch&Ops and explain our need in the summary section. I’m not sure.

We have a formal session (and likely informal ones) scheduled for the Ops meetup in Milan. We would like to continue the momentum by meeting for more F2F progress at the Boston summit.

If you could help, it would be appreciated.

Thanks,
--Rocky

_______________________________________________
User-committee mailing list
User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20170207/6c18e03a/attachment.html>