Open Stack

Jimmy,

It seems that we have a good engagement for this WG. I will advocate for allocating space during the Summit if possible.

Thanks,

Edgar

From: Jimmy McArthur <jimmy at openstack.org>
Date: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 7:28 AM
To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [User-committee] Request for Log Working Group

Hi all -

The request below came into speaker support and we need to address. However, I don't know if this is an active  WG or not. Can anyone clarify?

Cheers!
Jimmy
Rochelle.Grober<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__openstack.zendesk.com_agent_-23_users_455296376&d=DwMCAw&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=y_c_LUSDOcmJ-BHKLHo5Ghl1o2w99uWe8Abcx9l5cqE&s=v028PK6SPKtVonKhCh76n4FIHs4NP5H4QakNBVbOkLg&e=>Friday 17:36


Hi.

I am the Co-chair for the moribund Log Working group. I am resurrecting it and will be handing it over to a diverse team of DevOps who have committed to move forward with logging improvements via PWG, specs, and implementation. But, I can't submit a WG/Team request because I the WG is not "active." At least I think that is the reason. Unless I’m just supposed to title it Working Group/Team Space and pick presentation and and Arch&Ops and explain our need in the summary section. I’m not sure.

We have a formal session (and likely informal ones) scheduled for the Ops meetup in Milan. We would like to continue the momentum by meeting for more F2F progress at the Boston summit.

If you could help, it would be appreciated.

Thanks,
--Rocky
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20170207/15e7567b/attachment-0001.html>