Open Stack

It sounds a bit wrong to me this model.  Having all SIGs representation in only two members goes against what we have built. What’s the point of having committees?
How do we elect the TC and UC members for this role?
What are their responsibilities? Plus Shamail’s questions.

Can we have a more detailed discussion, maybe next UC IRC meeting?

Thanks,

Edgar

From: Shamail Tahir <itzshamail at gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, December 14, 2017 at 5:50 PM
To: Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman at gmail.com>
Cc: Edgar Magana <emagana at gmail.com>, user-committee <user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [User-committee] SIG Governance

Hi Melvin,

On Dec 14, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman at gmail.com<mailto:mrhillsman at gmail.com>> wrote:
Hey everyone,

Discussion regarding SIG governance came up in the #openstack-tc channel today, I think during TC office hours, and it was proposed that SIGs are loosely governed by one representative from the UC and the TC who are part of the Meta SIG; of course that is currently Thierry and myself. TC folks were ok with that and I took action to mention this to UC and determine if we agreed or not.

Thanks for sharing... I have a few questions which I am hoping you can answer:

- Is there any place that documents what “SIG governance” would be governing, its scope, and/or charter?
- Shouldn’t there be at least 3 members for SIG governance in case there ever needs to be a vote?
- What is the term for the UC and TC members participating as SIG governance? Would the TC and UC simply vote within their body and announce via ML?

Thanks,
Shamail



--
Kind regards,

Melvin Hillsman
mrhillsman at gmail.com<mailto:mrhillsman at gmail.com>
mobile: +1 (832) 264-2646
irc: mrhillsman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20171215/7e509043/attachment.html>