[User-committee] [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group
Matthew Czajka
matthew.czajka at ex.idig.net
Tue Nov 15 18:48:04 UTC 2016
I as well would be pretty interested
-Matt
On 2016-11-15, 7:41 AM, "Tobias Schön" <Tobias.Schon at fiberdata.se> wrote:
>This sounds very interesting indeed, i'll join up on that aswell!
>
>//Tobias
>
>-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
>Från: Mohammed Naser [mailto:mnaser at vexxhost.com]
>Skickat: den 15 november 2016 16:30
>Till: matt at mattjarvis.org.uk
>Kopia: OpenStack Operators; user-committee
>Ämne: Re: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working
>Group
>
>This sounds very interesting, put us down! :)
>
>On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:43 AM, matt Jarvis <matt at mattjarvis.org.uk>
>wrote:
>> So after input from a variety of sources over the last few weeks, I'd
>> very much like to try and put together a public cloud working group,
>> with the very high level goal of representing the interests of the
>> public cloud provider community around the globe.
>>
>> I'd like to propose that, in line with the new process for creation of
>> working groups, we set up some initial IRC meetings for all interested
>> parties. The goals for these initial meetings would be :
>>
>> 1. Define the overall scope and mission statement for the working
>> group 2. Set out the constituency for the group - communication
>> methods, definitions of public clouds, meeting schedules, chairs etc.
>> 3. Identify areas of interest - eg. technical issues, collaboration
>> opportunities
>>
>> Before I go ahead and schedule first meetings, I'd very much like to
>> gather input from the community on interested parties, and if this
>> seems like a reasonable first step forward. My thought initially was
>> to schedule a first meeting on #openstack-operators and then decide on
>> best timings, locations and communication methods from there, but again
>>I'd welcome input.
>>
>> At this point it would seem to me that one of the key metrics for this
>> working group to be successful is participation as widely as possible
>> within the public cloud provider community, currently approximately 21
>> companies globally according to
>>https://www.openstack.org/marketplace/public-clouds/.
>> If we could get representation from all of those companies in any
>> potential working group, then that would clearly be the best outcome,
>> although that may be optimistic ! As has become clear at recent Ops
>> events, it may be that not all of those companies are represented on
>> these lists, so I'd welcome any input on the best way to reach out to
>>those folks.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operator
>> s
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Mohammed Naser ‹ vexxhost
>-----------------------------------------------------
>D. 514-316-8872
>D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200
>E. mnaser at vexxhost.com
>W. http://vexxhost.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-operators mailing list
>OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-operators mailing list
>OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
More information about the User-committee
mailing list