Open Stack

Hello,

Yes, the process has changed. The most important thing is that we want any new (and existing) WG to create some momentum without the proper official “approval” from the User Committee. Once you have some work done and some activities delivered we could process the approval from UC.
So, far nothing will stop you to have IRC meetings, create your milestones and deliver some goals.

Thanks,

Edgar

From: David F Flanders <flanders at openstack.org>
Date: Monday, November 7, 2016 at 4:12 PM
To: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>, "user-committee at lists.openstack.org" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
Cc: Bruno Morel <bmorel at internap.com>, Matt Jarvis <matt.jarvis at datacentred.co.uk>, Sean Handley <sean.handley at datacentred.co.uk>, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot <jean-daniel.bonnetot at corp.ovh.com>, Stefano Maffulli <stefano.maffulli at dreamhost.com>
Subject: Re: [User-committee] Public Cloud Working Group

+1 for this WG having significantly different scope and membership.
I would also suggest that this would be an excellent potential candidate WG for minting one or more activities at the newly minted forum in Boston.

One slight suggestion: in writing up the scope (and anti-scope) of the WG, consideration should be made for how the group will work with other related WGs (and potentially co-located in meeting times).

For example:

a.)  how the public clouds could be providing guidance for the use of Shade SDK for AppDev a la AppEco-WG, and

b.) how the public clouds can continue to support the CloudAppHack-WG in providing cloud accounts for hackathon participants <- pretty plz 🙇
Below is the template for submitting as WG:

https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Procedure_for_Creating_a_New_Working_Group<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.openstack.org_wiki_Procedure-5Ffor-5FCreating-5Fa-5FNew-5FWorking-5FGroup&d=DgMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=S4ZW64zm80d8D0ByPliERwMLONl-aC5XQUhAmMh-koc&s=ZkBb41COfOkygMcVOfa-qHO1QQKeOhasqlWmpoyHp2A&e=>

^^@Edgar is this the latest version, re having 2x chairs and suggested times for timezone straddling betwen EU/USA/APAC?
Kind Regards,
Flandersd

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Matt Jarvis <matt.jarvis at datacentred.co.uk<mailto:matt.jarvis at datacentred.co.uk>> wrote:
+1

On 2 November 2016 at 23:18, Bruno Morel <bmorel at internap.com<mailto:bmorel at internap.com>> wrote:
So when ca we submit this to the User Committee ?... I think with have the critical mass :)

Bruno

From: Tobias Rydberg <tobias at citynetwork.se<mailto:tobias at citynetwork.se>>
Date: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 5:55 PM
To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [User-committee] Public Cloud Working Group

Hi,


I think this is a great suggestion from Sean, and I agree with the words from Curtis as well.

I work at a public cloud company and during our years with OpenStack we have seen a lot of things not suited for a public cloud. As Sean mentions, public cloud providers do their own fixes to get around this, and it would be much better with a joined force contributing this back to the community in a structured way.

Regards,
Tobias
Den 2016-10-31 kl. 16:49, skrev Curtis:

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Sean Handley

<sean.handley at datacentred.co.uk><mailto:sean.handley at datacentred.co.uk> wrote:

Hi,



I’d like to propose a working group for public cloud operators to help

deliver features across projects that support the needs of OpenStack public

cloud operators:



https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PublicCloudWorkingGroup<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.openstack.org_wiki_PublicCloudWorkingGroup&d=DgMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=S4ZW64zm80d8D0ByPliERwMLONl-aC5XQUhAmMh-koc&s=XdH5aU93mrRHkl1qUduwnQDyl1hxHr3nOoo-vkH1QfE&e=>

I no longer work at a public cloud, but if I was I would think this

group to be very important.



I think there is a class of what I would call regional public clouds,

all around the world the world, and I think these are important

organizations worth supporting as much as possible. Speaking as

someone who used to work at one, it is invaluable to have peers to

discuss similar issues with. I would be very surprised if any of these

regional clouds feel as through they are fully staffed, and in fact

are often quite small. The ability to band together to solve common

problems and implement common solutions is extremely powerful, and I

think exactly what a working group would do.



Further, I do believe there is enough difference in the requirements

of a public cloud versus a private one to ensure that this working

group will have sufficient work. Private clouds can often (not always,

but often) solve problems by telling their users not to do something,

"it's against company policy", or even not supporting the feature,

whereas that is harder in a public cloud. Even the simple difference

of the fact that their APIs are available on the Internet is a

considerable change from a typical, IMHO, private cloud. Those are

just a couple examples. Certainly some would disagree with me, but I

feel there is fairly substantial difference between running a private

cloud and a public one.



My $0.02,

Curtis.



Cheers,

Sean Handley.



DataCentred Limited registered in England and Wales no. 05611763

_______________________________________________

User-committee mailing list

User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>

http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DgMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=S4ZW64zm80d8D0ByPliERwMLONl-aC5XQUhAmMh-koc&s=DZzj2aVh57qm2xEDAkuvPJ2SglhjIMrHgY5OuzeSvTE&e=>







--


[cid:image001.png at 01D23914.A9FD61D0]



Tobias Rydberg
Senior Developer

Mobile: +46 733 312780
Support: +46 8 4000 9000

tobias.rydberg at citynetwork.se<mailto:tobias.rydberg at citynetwork.se>
www.citynetwork.se<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.citynetwork.se&d=DgMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=S4ZW64zm80d8D0ByPliERwMLONl-aC5XQUhAmMh-koc&s=pPRW_gWFtw-4BvPiUL_IP4gpkeZ8-MwfK2WOUstmQGc&e=>

City Network Hosting AB
Borgmästaregatan 18
SE-371 34 Karlskrona
Sweden


Innovation through open IT Infrastructure

ISO 9001, 14001, 27001, 27015 & 27018 Certified



_______________________________________________
User-committee mailing list
User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DgMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=S4ZW64zm80d8D0ByPliERwMLONl-aC5XQUhAmMh-koc&s=DZzj2aVh57qm2xEDAkuvPJ2SglhjIMrHgY5OuzeSvTE&e=>


DataCentred Limited registered in England and Wales no. 05611763

_______________________________________________
User-committee mailing list
User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DgMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=S4ZW64zm80d8D0ByPliERwMLONl-aC5XQUhAmMh-koc&s=DZzj2aVh57qm2xEDAkuvPJ2SglhjIMrHgY5OuzeSvTE&e=>



--
Flanders | OpenStack Foundation | Community Manager (Cloud Application Communities)
http://superuser.openstack.org/articles/meet-openstack-s-community-wrangler-david-flanders<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__superuser.openstack.org_articles_meet-2Dopenstack-2Ds-2Dcommunity-2Dwrangler-2Ddavid-2Dflanders&d=DgMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=S4ZW64zm80d8D0ByPliERwMLONl-aC5XQUhAmMh-koc&s=TONSxMBqm8ir12l_GMfxM6yyBZa_-A92Odd8YbmNjOg&e=>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20161108/25e773b8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5116 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20161108/25e773b8/attachment-0001.png>