Open Stack

+1 for this WG having significantly different scope and membership.
I would also suggest that this would be an excellent potential candidate WG
for minting one or more activities at the newly minted forum in Boston.

One slight suggestion: in writing up the scope (and anti-scope) of the WG,
consideration should be made for how the group will work with other related
WGs (and potentially co-located in meeting times).

For example:

a.)  how the public clouds could be providing guidance for the use of Shade
SDK for AppDev a la AppEco-WG, and

b.) how the public clouds can continue to support the CloudAppHack-WG in
providing cloud accounts for hackathon participants <- pretty plz 🙇

Below is the template for submitting as WG:

https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Procedure_for_Creating_a_New_Working_Group

^^@Edgar is this the latest version, re having 2x chairs and suggested
times for timezone straddling betwen EU/USA/APAC?

Kind Regards,

Flandersd

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Matt Jarvis <matt.jarvis at datacentred.co.uk>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On 2 November 2016 at 23:18, Bruno Morel <bmorel at internap.com> wrote:
>
>> So when ca we submit this to the User Committee ?... I think with have
>> the critical mass :)
>>
>>
>>
>> Bruno
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Tobias Rydberg <tobias at citynetwork.se>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 5:55 PM
>> *To: *"user-committee at lists.openstack.org" <user-committee at lists.openstac
>> k.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [User-committee] Public Cloud Working Group
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I think this is a great suggestion from Sean, and I agree with the words
>> from Curtis as well.
>>
>> I work at a public cloud company and during our years with OpenStack we
>> have seen a lot of things not suited for a public cloud. As Sean mentions,
>> public cloud providers do their own fixes to get around this, and it would
>> be much better with a joined force contributing this back to the community
>> in a structured way.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tobias
>>
>> Den 2016-10-31 kl. 16:49, skrev Curtis:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Sean Handley
>>
>> <sean.handley at datacentred.co.uk> <sean.handley at datacentred.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I’d like to propose a working group for public cloud operators to help
>>
>> deliver features across projects that support the needs of OpenStack public
>>
>> cloud operators:
>>
>>
>>
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PublicCloudWorkingGroup
>>
>> I no longer work at a public cloud, but if I was I would think this
>>
>> group to be very important.
>>
>>
>>
>> I think there is a class of what I would call regional public clouds,
>>
>> all around the world the world, and I think these are important
>>
>> organizations worth supporting as much as possible. Speaking as
>>
>> someone who used to work at one, it is invaluable to have peers to
>>
>> discuss similar issues with. I would be very surprised if any of these
>>
>> regional clouds feel as through they are fully staffed, and in fact
>>
>> are often quite small. The ability to band together to solve common
>>
>> problems and implement common solutions is extremely powerful, and I
>>
>> think exactly what a working group would do.
>>
>>
>>
>> Further, I do believe there is enough difference in the requirements
>>
>> of a public cloud versus a private one to ensure that this working
>>
>> group will have sufficient work. Private clouds can often (not always,
>>
>> but often) solve problems by telling their users not to do something,
>>
>> "it's against company policy", or even not supporting the feature,
>>
>> whereas that is harder in a public cloud. Even the simple difference
>>
>> of the fact that their APIs are available on the Internet is a
>>
>> considerable change from a typical, IMHO, private cloud. Those are
>>
>> just a couple examples. Certainly some would disagree with me, but I
>>
>> feel there is fairly substantial difference between running a private
>>
>> cloud and a public one.
>>
>>
>>
>> My $0.02,
>>
>> Curtis.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Sean Handley.
>>
>>
>>
>> DataCentred Limited registered in England and Wales no. 05611763
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> User-committee mailing list
>>
>> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Tobias Rydberg*
>> Senior Developer
>>
>> Mobile: +46 733 312780
>> Support: +46 8 4000 9000
>>
>> tobias.rydberg at citynetwork.se
>> www.citynetwork.se
>>
>> City Network Hosting AB
>> Borgmästaregatan 18
>> SE-371 34 Karlskrona
>> Sweden
>>
>>
>> Innovation through open IT Infrastructure
>>
>> * ISO 9001, 14001, 27001, 27015 & 27018 Certified *
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> User-committee mailing list
>> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>>
>>
>
> DataCentred Limited registered in England and Wales no. 05611763
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>
>


-- 
Flanders | OpenStack Foundation | Community Manager (Cloud Application
Communities)
http://superuser.openstack.org/articles/meet-openstack-s-
community-wrangler-david-flanders
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20161108/aab73f10/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5115 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20161108/aab73f10/attachment-0001.png>