[User-committee] Public Cloud Working Group

Tobias Rydberg tobias at citynetwork.se
Wed Nov 2 21:55:18 UTC 2016


Hi,

I think this is a great suggestion from Sean, and I agree with the words 
from Curtis as well.

I work at a public cloud company and during our years with OpenStack we 
have seen a lot of things not suited for a public cloud. As Sean 
mentions, public cloud providers do their own fixes to get around this, 
and it would be much better with a joined force contributing this back 
to the community in a structured way.

Regards,
Tobias


Den 2016-10-31 kl. 16:49, skrev Curtis:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Sean Handley
> <sean.handley at datacentred.co.uk> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’d like to propose a working group for public cloud operators to help
>> deliver features across projects that support the needs of OpenStack public
>> cloud operators:
>>
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PublicCloudWorkingGroup
> I no longer work at a public cloud, but if I was I would think this
> group to be very important.
>
> I think there is a class of what I would call regional public clouds,
> all around the world the world, and I think these are important
> organizations worth supporting as much as possible. Speaking as
> someone who used to work at one, it is invaluable to have peers to
> discuss similar issues with. I would be very surprised if any of these
> regional clouds feel as through they are fully staffed, and in fact
> are often quite small. The ability to band together to solve common
> problems and implement common solutions is extremely powerful, and I
> think exactly what a working group would do.
>
> Further, I do believe there is enough difference in the requirements
> of a public cloud versus a private one to ensure that this working
> group will have sufficient work. Private clouds can often (not always,
> but often) solve problems by telling their users not to do something,
> "it's against company policy", or even not supporting the feature,
> whereas that is harder in a public cloud. Even the simple difference
> of the fact that their APIs are available on the Internet is a
> considerable change from a typical, IMHO, private cloud. Those are
> just a couple examples. Certainly some would disagree with me, but I
> feel there is fairly substantial difference between running a private
> cloud and a public one.
>
> My $0.02,
> Curtis.
>
>> Cheers,
>> Sean Handley.
>>
>> DataCentred Limited registered in England and Wales no. 05611763
>> _______________________________________________
>> User-committee mailing list
>> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>>
>
>

-- 



	*Tobias Rydberg*
Senior Developer

Mobile: +46 733 312780
Support: +46 8 4000 9000

tobias.rydberg at citynetwork.se <mailto:tobias.rydberg at citynetwork.se>
www.citynetwork.se <http://www.citynetwork.se>

City Network Hosting AB
Borgmästaregatan 18
SE-371 34 Karlskrona
Sweden


Innovation through open IT Infrastructure

ISO 9001, 14001, 27001, 27015 & 27018 Certified

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20161102/5a6e1fc8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CityNetwork-Logo-Regular-2015-RGB.png
Type: image/png
Size: 42960 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20161102/5a6e1fc8/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3945 bytes
Desc: S/MIME-kryptografisk signatur
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20161102/5a6e1fc8/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the User-committee mailing list