[User-committee] [app-catalog] [app] [recognition] [AppDev] [api] The Big "App" alignement : shall we gather
Brett Kugler
brett.kugler at gdt.com
Thu May 26 18:50:03 UTC 2016
I would also like to +1 this. There seems to be a lot of cross chatter – to the point where I have been confused about postings to the User-committee list and which group was actually talking about the issue.
Brett
From: Jimmy Mcarthur [mailto:jimmy at tipit.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 11:22 AM
To: Bruno Morel
Cc: user-committee
Subject: Re: [User-committee] [app-catalog] [app] [recognition] [AppDev] [api] The Big "App" alignement : shall we gather
+1!
Bruno Morel wrote:
Hi All,
Maybe it’s just me, but I have this perception that a lot of people in the community are converging the answer the same challenge/question/problem domain : how to facilitate and welcome app developers and their apps.
I’m part of multiple WG and teams and I see discussion popping in and out about this quite regularly…
I know it’s a bit early in the cycle, but I’d like to see if there is support for a session that would regroup and open up discussion from all the WG/Team that are dipping their toes in the middle of this big giant Venn Diagram of a subject.
As a developer, I have to think that we can apply ‘factorization’ to our effort, minimize redundancy, and hopefully maximize happiness by agreeing :)
As I see it, the API-Catalog effort, the API-WG, the App-Ecosystem WG, the First-App Team, the Enterprise Application WG, the Product Team, the App-Hackaton-WG, and probably some more could define a small subset of common goal and priority to be aimed at and share…From there, we would all benefit from each other progress…
Each WG having specific aim, goals and objective, would keep them and still invest in achieving them.
But I can’t stop to think that there is an underground thread of common unity (community, see what I did there ? :P) that could be tighten up a bit to the benefit of all.
In any case, a 2h session can't be THAT bad for all the working group / team involved…no ? :)
Let me know what you think
Thanks,
Bruno
_______________________________________________
User-committee mailing list
User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20160526/b4921b9c/attachment.html>
More information about the User-committee
mailing list