Open Stack

Just a suggestion: Rather than define Œusers¹ why not lean on the
persona¹s that the UX group created?

(disclaimer - I¹m part of the UX group)


From:  Shamail <itzshamail at gmail.com>
Date:  Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 4:19 PM
To:  Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>
Cc:  "openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org"
<openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>,
"user-committee at lists.openstack.org" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
Subject:  Re: [Openstack-operators] [recognition] Non-ATC Recognition
WG	Meeting Today (5/12/2016)


Hi Edgar,

On May 19, 2016, at 7:00 PM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com> wrote:



Shamail and Team,
 
Where are we I defining the activities for recognizing OpenStack Users? In
my mind we have completed the definition and we agreed on:
AUC ­ Active User Contributor
We encourage the following activities:

* Organizers of any of the
groups.openstack.org <http://groups.openstack.org>
* Active members and contributors to Functional Teams and/or Working
Groups.
* Operators meet-up moderator
* Contributing to any repository under the UC governance (i.e. os-ops and
user stories)
* Track chairs for OpenStack Summits
* Contributors to superuser (articles, interviews, user stories, etc.)
* Active moderators on ask.openstack

If all this make sense, Do we still need to have this WG?





We have agreed on the contributors for phase 1 of the user-committee
constituency and we are currently working on milestone-3 which is to
define the metrics (and methods used to collect metrics) associated with
the given activities.

We have a few more milestones remaining[1] which concludes with us
wrapping up the findings and sharing them with the user committee.

I think it still makes sense for the working group to exist (for now)
since we still need to formulate how we will capture the necessary metrics
to validate that an individual meets the requirements for one of the roles
mentioned by you.  We are also thinking
 about how to automate data collection and possibly integrate these
metrics with Stackalytics (longer term) to give credit via that tool.

Please let me know if pursuing the remaining milestones make sense since
we started the WG to help meet objectives given to us by the user
committee.

[1] 
https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=NonATCRecognition&mobileaction
=toggle_view_desktop#Milestones

Thanks,
Shamail 


 
Thanks,
 
Edgar
 
From: Shamail <itzshamail at gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, May 12, 2016 at 9:04 AM
To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org"
<user-committee at lists.openstack.org>,
"openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org"
 <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [Openstack-operators] [recognition] Non-ATC Recognition WG
Meeting Today (5/12/2016)

 

Hi everyone, 




The Non-ATC Recognition WG will be meeting today and the agenda has been
posted on our wiki[1].  The team will be reviewing the results from
working session in Austin in today's meeting.





Meeting information:

Date: 5/12

Time: 1900 UTC <x-apple-data-detectors://3>

IRC Channel: #openstack-meeting-3





[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NonATCRecognition
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.openstack.org_wi
ki_NonATCRecognition&d=CwMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc
&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=dUhuG0ctBxVkxyXgUSqylXcu4C
9AI_p_yhpVEVdDU28&s=tjOITg7VH7KsJPwnZiB9PwqRQ6E0Man32sD5hnPXI-M&e=>


 

Thank you,

Shamail