Open Stack

Good question. We recruited a user survey working group this cycle to help with comment analysis, and Piet was one of the volunteers. 

The comments they reviewed were not associated with any user, but we still asked them to sign the User Committee confidentiality agreement.


> On May 12, 2016, at 8:25 PM, Roland Chan <roland at aptira.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Piet. I think we need to get the Foundation to coordinate the activity because of the privacy concerns around looking at the raw survey data.
> 
> Lauren, is that correct?
> 
> ​Roland
> 
> On 12 May 2016 at 12:21, Kruithof Jr, Pieter <pieter.kruithof.jr at intel.com <mailto:pieter.kruithof.jr at intel.com>> wrote:
> Hi Roland,
> 
> I was one of the folks that helped with the analysis of the qualitative data this last survey.  I don’t mind helping again if you’re looking for volunteers.  
> 
> Piet
> 
> Piet Kruithof
>  
> Sr User Experience Architect, 
> Intel Open Source Technology Group
>  
> Project Technical Lead (PTL)
> OpenStack UX project
> 
> From: Roland Chan <roland at aptira.com <mailto:roland at aptira.com>>
> Date: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 7:49 PM
> To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>>
> Subject: [User-committee] Analysis of User Survey
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> We did a little bit of deeper analysis of the last user survey, particularly with respect to NPS scores. I'd certainly be interested in continuing that effort to see if there are trends in the data now that we have another data point.
> 
> Anyone else think so?
> 
> Roland
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20160512/82bb3437/attachment.html>