Open Stack

I would love to help with the SDK task. I have experience with shade 
internals, so I can help to have it in shape for what is needed.

Ghe Rivero

On 03/05/16 22:47, Diaz, Victor H wrote:
>
> Sounds like a good plan
>
> *From:*Shamail Tahir [mailto:itzshamail at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 3, 2016 2:46 PM
> *To:* Diaz, Victor H <victor.h.diaz at intel.com>
> *Cc:* Callaghan, John <john.callaghan at hpe.com>; 
> user-committee at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* Re: [User-committee] Application Ecosystem Working Group 
> Post Austin Summit Priority List
>
> Absolutely Victor!!
>
> I will try to make the App Ecosystem WG meetings as much as 
> possible... I will also ensure we keep the team updated on our 
> progress with the matrix.
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Diaz, Victor H 
> <victor.h.diaz at intel.com <mailto:victor.h.diaz at intel.com>> wrote:
>
>     I would like to volunteer to do this J
>
>     Can I work with You Shamail?
>
>     Victor
>
>     *From:*Shamail Tahir [mailto:itzshamail at gmail.com
>     <mailto:itzshamail at gmail.com>]
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, May 3, 2016 1:43 PM
>     *To:* Callaghan, John <john.callaghan at hpe.com
>     <mailto:john.callaghan at hpe.com>>
>     *Cc:* user-committee at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>     *Subject:* Re: [User-committee] Application Ecosystem Working
>     Group Post Austin Summit Priority List
>
>     Hi John,
>
>     I would like to also work on a SDK matrix during this release to
>     migrate our information from the google spreadsheet into a
>     community maintainable format.  The added benefit to this approach
>     will be that SDK developers/maintainers can update their services
>     support or add themselves to the list.  Is there anyone from the
>     App Ecosystem WG that would be willing to volunteer to help with
>     this?
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Shamail
>
>     On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Callaghan, John
>     <john.callaghan at hpe.com <mailto:john.callaghan at hpe.com>> wrote:
>
>         Coming away from our productive working group session we
>         established the following three priorities for the group for
>         the next cycle.
>
>         A link to the session etherpad is listed and _welcome to
>         input_ here:
>         https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/AppEcoSystem_WG_Austin_Meetup
>
>         *Working Session Goals:*
>
>         *Define top 3 priorities from Agenda for the Newton cycle*
>
>         1.*Review Charter *
>
>         §*(Task Force - Subgroup determined from next post summit
>         meeting)*
>
>         §Volunteers: John Callaghan HPE,
>
>         2.*Python SDK - First App and get it published We need a win
>         for Python whether it be pythonsdk, shade or libcloud*
>
>         §Craig Sterrett to drive with SDK owners
>
>         §Preparation for training to add value in Barcelona
>
>         3.*Consider IRC in addition to 2 x monthly calls*
>
>         §Christopher Aedo to drive with foundation through
>         User-committee mailing list
>
>         Cheers,
>
>         John Callaghan
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         User-committee mailing list
>         User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>         <mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>         http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>
>
>
>     -- 
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Shamail Tahir
>
>     t: @ShamailXD
>
>     tz: Eastern Time
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shamail Tahir
>
> t: @ShamailXD
>
> tz: Eastern Time
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20160503/1c1de977/attachment-0001.html>