[User-committee] [Openstack-operators] [telco][nfv][telecom-nfv] ops telecom-nfv working group meeting #3 results
Edgar Magana
edgar.magana at workday.com
Tue Jul 26 20:29:53 UTC 2016
Curtis,
Thank you so much for the details and answers. It makes sense to me and we should move forward for having you under the umbrella of the UC. I will update the wiki page and later the repo with this functional team.
Cheers,
Edgar
On 7/26/16, 10:10 AM, "Curtis" <serverascode at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
After reading the User Committee document [0] and re-reading this
email, I think I have a better idea of what you were asking.
In our last Operators Telecom/NFV meeting we reviewed the document and
all agreed that we would fall under the User Committee and that we are
likely a functional team as opposed to a working group [1].
As a team we would like to move forward in ensuring we are meeting the
OpenStack communities requirements.
Thanks,
Curtis.
[0]: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1QmLOeseAkjBWM-5FTXsUeKBErNaSHnuZp81II0T71ARfo_edit&d=CwIFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=qfG9H7I5hM9Kyhfd5krA8maimUKcTPv1JFjN2GkoyKQ&s=DyiqONnHPXx75AAjhhvFXREsKdxjl649PzkIASRsFOY&e=
[1]: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__eavesdrop.openstack.org_meetings_operators-5Ftelco-5Fnfv_2016_operators-5Ftelco-5Fnfv.2016-2D07-2D13-2D15.00.html&d=CwIFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=qfG9H7I5hM9Kyhfd5krA8maimUKcTPv1JFjN2GkoyKQ&s=Rewqd-Yh5S96YFmlGMVv06wn4nDh6nTOUzvgatYC8ic&e=
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Curtis <serverascode at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com> wrote:
>> Curtis,
>>
>> Do you see this WG under the umbrella of the User Committee or the Technical Committee? I am trying to gather all the WGs under the UC in order to add them into our charter. Please, clarify where do you see this WG.
>
> Hi Edgar,
>
> I think it would be great to be under the UC. I believe your previous
> email specifically said not new groups, so I put it to the side in my
> mind for the time being, but would be happy to work through whatever
> measures are required to be in compliance. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Curtis.
>
>> For the UC charter details, we are working on this document for the charter:
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1QmLOeseAkjBWM-5FTXsUeKBErNaSHnuZp81II0T71ARfo_edit-3Fusp-3Dsharing&d=CwIFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=qfG9H7I5hM9Kyhfd5krA8maimUKcTPv1JFjN2GkoyKQ&s=85P4XVnZrrDHH39SS0NQUEXPz_22aAfMBBZ1-0gGwE0&e=
>>
>> Per my email:
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_pipermail_user-2Dcommittee_2016-2DJuly_001089.html&d=CwIFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=qfG9H7I5hM9Kyhfd5krA8maimUKcTPv1JFjN2GkoyKQ&s=qetJPrjQFiwif7VZMjlUy-JoBqBgGQk67QR6fTASypY&e=
>>
>> UC needs to approve and validate all WGs under its umbrella and obviously provide them support and resources from the Foundation, like space during the summit and/or potential sponsor for WG activities.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>> On 7/9/16, 10:56 AM, "Curtis" <serverascode at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> First, sorry about the weird tags on this email, but one of the things
>> we decided last meeting was to use the tag [telecom-nfv] for this
>> working group. Next time I email I'll just use that tag. (Note:
>> telecom not telco.)
>>
>> The second thing we did was work on a mission statement [1]. A
>> volunteer kindly put together an intial "strawperson" mission
>> statement so that we could at least have something to edit and think
>> about--a place to start.
>>
>> Also the OPNFV team has created an IRC channel they are using for
>> openstack related discussions [2].
>>
>> We will have our 4th bi-weekly meeting next Weds [3]; hope to see you there.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Curtis.
>>
>> [1]: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__etherpad.openstack.org_p_ops-2Dtelecom-2Dnfv-2Dmission-2Dstatement&d=CwICAg&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=lFkl4r7oVhlHxsqAJcKB8385I-Z1mfqqVR7ot1ZrNnQ&s=d6OkuIqGHdW0Uy9ixANQXfXT2xnOpFbf1Ppw9-BpQ-4&e=
>> [2]: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_pipermail_openstack-2Doperators_2016-2DJuly_010960.html&d=CwICAg&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=lFkl4r7oVhlHxsqAJcKB8385I-Z1mfqqVR7ot1ZrNnQ&s=O69O8WwufDsepuqeKiyJlKYIcJ9WcYe-8H0SYxOoon4&e=
>> [3]: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__eavesdrop.openstack.org_-23OpenStack-5FOperators-5FTelco-5Fand-5FNFV-5FWorking-5FGroup&d=CwICAg&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=lFkl4r7oVhlHxsqAJcKB8385I-Z1mfqqVR7ot1ZrNnQ&s=73fuMMVfRkikDNBgZnRmV4nkrcKojzMUyvE80Kblls4&e=
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_openstack-2Doperators&d=CwICAg&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=lFkl4r7oVhlHxsqAJcKB8385I-Z1mfqqVR7ot1ZrNnQ&s=qkP8FsietFuSX1M294FsIcJhHx4zwsRhvr9NbImyGNY&e=
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Blog: serverascode.com
--
Blog: serverascode.com
More information about the User-committee
mailing list