Open Stack

I agree with Jonathan, in detail :

* making it a regular, scheduled thing : everybody in the community would know and expect every 6 month (or 3 month ?) to have the opportunity to give feedback, especially if it is pre / post cycle (ex. : January -> July -> January …)
* Making it a community wide effort and consolidated in one ‘interaction’ / survey : having the ability to check/uncheck which project you want to give feedback about would be very useful and probably help focus each set of question to each project goals / needs
* A main section would be, in my opinion, the right place to get all the general project-independant information we want to gather and any related question to the community efforts

Bruno







On 2015-09-28, 15:06, "Jonathan Proulx" <jon at csail.mit.edu> wrote:

>
>I'm thinking we try (next round) to wrap this into the user survey.
>
>If we can organized the PTL surveys as optional and at the end
>hopefully we can retain the short general overview an relatively high
>response. 
>
>If the survey is arranged so PTLs can send deeper links to say 'update
>your Neuron usage survey' that go directly to that sub part we may not
>completely solve the survey over load but we can at least eliminate
>the duplication and bring all the data under the same privacy model.
>
>I'm thinking an "optional tab" at the end of the survey, after we
>thank you for your responses, with a list of links to project specific
>sections.
>
>-Jon 
>
>
>On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 05:03:49PM +0000, Tim Bell wrote:
>: 
>:
>:There have been a couple of project surveys of OpenStack users in the past
>:week (Neutron and Ceilometer).
>:
>: 
>:
>:They tend to duplicate the standard questions (industry, size of deployment,
>:release levels, .) and also some of the questions we are currently asking in
>:the survey (nova network, metering feedback). The commitment to anonymity is
>:also not always clear.
>:
>: 
>:
>:The difficulty I see is that we reach survey limits, where people are not
>:sure what is official and whether the questions/audience may lead to a bias.
>:
>: 
>:
>:On the other hand, the PTLs often want more detailed information and the
>:user survey needs to be kept to a reasonable length (to avoid we lose
>:everything because people bailed out before finishing).
>:
>: 
>:
>:Any suggestions on how to proceed ? 
>:
>: 
>:
>:Tim
>:
>: 
>:
>
>
>
>:_______________________________________________
>:User-committee mailing list
>:User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>:http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>
>
>--