Didn't see any further discussion on this important topic so thought I'd chime in. Reading previous posts on this topic I understand that for agility reasons we're limiting the size of the committee. I think it would be a good idea to also get some up front commitment from prospective members as to how much time they could possibly spend on the UC's activities once we really get going. No point having a diverse crew with lots of potential if they don't have the time. --- Arvind Srinivasan ----------------------------------------- IBM Cloud Strategy & Technology Standards Email: arvindsr at us.ibm.com Phone: +1 919 673 1082 ----------------------------------------- From: Ryan Lane <rlane at wikimedia.org> To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org>, Date: 05/09/2013 11:10 AM Subject: [User-committee] User committee appointements Howdy. It's been a while since the summit and I believe our first order of business was to appoint new members. We got a number of offers for help, collectively. Also, there were a number of folks from the user groups that looked like good candidates for appointment. How should we proceed with appointments? - Ryan_______________________________________________ User-committee mailing list User-committee at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20130514/b7e0f21f/attachment.html>