Open Stack

Apache is used for the software. We were able to change the wiki license to
CC-BY, and I think it's a much saner license for data/documentation.

- Ryan


On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:49 PM, JC Martin <jcmartin at ebaysf.com> wrote:

>  Actually Many Eyes seems an interesting tool. We would have to figure
> out the data usage policy first before to put anything there, even
> anonymous.
> What is the license for the foundation data ? Apache ? Some flavor of CC ?
>
>  JC
>
>   From: Arvind Srinivasan <arvindsr at us.ibm.com>
> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:41:50 -0700
> To: JC Martin <jcmartin at eBaysf.com>
> Cc: Bob Ball <bob.ball at citrix.com>, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch>, "
> user-committee at lists.openstack.org" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>
> Subject: Re: [User-committee] Details of public survey results
>
>  JC, thats a great idea. I think the community collaborating and
> generating different visualizations off of a public dataset and tagging /
> sharing them so we can all see these things in one place is a powerful
> concept. Opensource the visualizations! I think a tool like Many Eyes<http://www-958.ibm.com/software/analytics/manyeyes/>will be great for this.
>
> DISCLAIMER: This isn't a plug for Many Eyes at all (I've only used it a
> couple of times before and it gave me impressive results for the time I
> spent with it), but it just so happens that its one of the free tools out
> there that lets you do neat visualizations with the added social angle
> which in this case could be beneficial to the community.
>
> ---
> Arvind Srinivasan
> -----------------------------------------
> IBM Cloud Strategy & Technology Standards
> Email: *arvindsr at us.ibm.com* <arvindsr at us.ibm.com>
> Phone: +1 919 673 1082
> -----------------------------------------
>
>
>
>   From: JC Martin <jcmartin at ebaysf.com>  To: Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch>,
> Bob Ball <bob.ball at citrix.com>, "user-committee at lists.openstack.org" <
> user-committee at lists.openstack.org>,  Date: 04/29/2013 02:48 PM  Subject: Re:
> [User-committee] Details of public survey results
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Tim,
>
> I was thinking that it would be more scalable if we have the database
> exposed in real time, after scrubbing, through something like Tableau.
> Everyone will want to look at some specific aspects.
> Also, there should be a policy for the publication and use of the data,
> even the public ones.
>
> JC
> On 4/29/13 12:25 PM, "Tim Bell" <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
>
> >
> >I'm trying to put together a document which will give the aggregated data
> >in spreadsheets and address queries such as
> >Hypervisors/Deployments. My target is in the next few weeks if the day
> >job is quiet.
> >
> >As regards the organisation names, there are some additional checks that
> >the user committee and foundation need to perform to
> >validate the information can *really* be made public. This will take
> >significantly longer.
> >
> >Tim
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Bob Ball [mailto:bob.ball at citrix.com <bob.ball at citrix.com>]
> >> Sent: 29 April 2013 13:27
> >> To: user-committee at lists.openstack.org
> >> Subject: [User-committee] Details of public survey results
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I was wondering if there was any way to view more detailed information
> >>from the user survey results which have been marked as
> >public?
> >>
> >> We're interested in a number of sub-sets of the statistics presented,
> >>for example if you focus on the hypervisor we would be
> >interested in
> >> the distribution of deployed hypervisors on production vs PoC
> >>deployments, statistics on multiple hypervisors deployments, or the
> >scales of
> >> the deployments using the different hypervisors.
> >>
> >> We're also interested in how the users of particular features map on to
> >>the organisations who have agreed to make their profile
> >public -
> >> for example, Citrix would be interested in which of the organisations
> >>on http://www.openstack.org/user-stories/ were using Xen or
> >> XenServer in their deployment.  Is there a plan to make a subset of the
> >>survey information public where this was agreed to when
> >the
> >> survey was filled in?
> >>
> >> Many thanks,
> >>
> >> Bob
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> User-committee mailing list
> >> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
> >_______________________________________________
> >User-committee mailing list
> >User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20130430/4576503d/attachment-0001.html>