Open Stack

Looking at the tools, I'm happy with ideascale. being able to identify the
requester is necessary as we try to refine the requirement to a blueprint.
Uservoice seemed to have a lot of other things that we would not be using.

 

For people who wish to contribute anonymously, we're looking at some form of
NDA for the user committee members and thus, we could provide the
information on behalf of an anonymous user but remain a good conduit for any
feedback.

 

Tim

 

From: Joshua McKenty [mailto:joshua at pistoncloud.com] 
Sent: 07 March 2013 22:10
To: Tim Bell
Cc: user-committee at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: FW: [openstack] - [New Idea] - Automatically track
non-engineering ATCs

 

Yes, exactly - this is targeting step 1. Uservoice allows anonymous ideas
and feedback, while either of them can integrate with outside SSO solutions
(using the user DB from the foundation is an obvious one).

 

Joshua

 

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch
<mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch> > wrote:

 

What's your impressions of the tool ?

 

I see there being several stages to define user requirements

 

1.       User identifies need (but should not be expected to define the
solution)

2.       Following technical analysis, blueprint(s) are created based on the
identified need which map into architecturally valid components to solve the
user need

3.       Bugs/Features are raised, implemented and resolved to address the
need in the appropriate release cycle

 

Would the tool be a feasible method to gather needs or are there others ? I
would like to avoid further user registration if possible.

 

Tim

 

From: Joshua McKenty [mailto:joshua at pistoncloud.com
<mailto:joshua at pistoncloud.com> ] 
Sent: 05 March 2013 03:36
To: Tim Bell
Subject: Re: FW: [openstack] - [New Idea] - Automatically track
non-engineering ATCs

 

Sorry about that; I just wanted to see if it was possible and forgot to set
it back. The goal is to test using an ideation and voting framework for
ad-hoc user feedback; I'm also testing uservoice at
openstacker.uservoice.com <http://openstacker.uservoice.com> .

On Mar 3, 2013 5:10 AM, "Tim Bell" <Tim.Bell at cern.ch
<mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch> > wrote:

 

Joshua,

 

These mails appear to be coming from the user committee. Can you explain the
goals ?

 

Tim

 

 

From: OpenStack User Committee [mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org
<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org> ] 
Sent: 03 March 2013 00:56
To: Tim Bell
Subject: [openstack] - [New Idea] - Automatically track non-engineering ATCs

 


  <http://ideascale.com/images/email/head.gif> 


Idea: Automatically track non-engineering ATCs

Author: Joshua McKenty

Doc writers, bug reporters and blueprint authors should all automatically be
ATCs of the related project (and we have the tools necessary to track this).

 
<http://openstack.ideascale.com/a/token/JsYbCizaKcUdO6VG0zhikHgK07QATo4x4mnY
cEc8_pTOpHLlQzadFRODRQ9VdeTC_yZhYdLcSfEHqNLH7yCdT-JEDKy7AAejfKhmCurSJ1f7JSWD
vVI93zEZTZmnrFlL> Click link

 





 

-- 

--
Joshua McKenty, CTO
Piston Cloud Computing, Inc.
w: (650) 24-CLOUD
m: (650) 283-6846
http://www.pistoncloud.com

"Oh, Westley, we'll never survive!"
"Nonsense. You're only saying that because no one ever has."

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20130308/ffe03095/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5215 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20130308/ffe03095/attachment.bin>