[User-committee] Summit

JC Martin jcmartin at ebaysf.com
Wed Apr 3 21:08:00 UTC 2013


I can do breakfast on Monday.

Do we have an ETA for the results ? I may have missed the discssion if it already happened.

JC

From: Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch<mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch>>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:45:55 +0000
To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [User-committee] Summit


Great… we’ll work on that basis. I hope we won’t have too much work to convert the survey information to slides, I don’t think there will be need for large amounts of interpretation but more an opportunity to report the figures and leave some time for discussion.

If we’re able to get the results this week, JC and I can prepare summaries during the following week.

How about getting together for breakfast around 8am on the Monday ?

I’d like to have a chat regarding how we’d like to handle the requests from various people regarding helping out with the work of the user committee and I’m sure they’ll be other items that will come out of the survey.

Tim

From: JC Martin [mailto:jcmartin at ebaysf.com]
Sent: 03 April 2013 18:07
To: Ryan Lane; Tim Bell
Cc: user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [User-committee] Summit

Works for me too.

JC

From: Ryan Lane <rlane at wikimedia.org<mailto:rlane at wikimedia.org>>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:47:22 -0400
To: Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch<mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch>>
Cc: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [User-committee] Summit

Tim,

This sounds like a good plan to me.

- Ryan

On Wednesday, April 3, 2013, Tim Bell wrote:

Ryan/JC,

We’ve got a slot at the summit on Monday at 11:50 to talk about the user committee and survey results.

I was working out how we could structure the 40 minutes…. 3 chunks came to mind:


A.      Summary of user committee role and future plans (something close to Ryan’s presentation to the board)

B.      User survey – feedback from the users such as their interaction with OpenStack, common areas to improve and goals for the foundation

C.      Deployment survey – who is using what and how are they using it

Given the short time, I suspect the deployment survey part would need the most time but something like 10+5+15 minutes with 10 minutes for Q&A would work.

For a strawman, how about the following ?

A – Ryan
B – Tim
C – JC

I’m fine doing any of the sessions so if there are strong preferences, shout…

Tim



_______________________________________________ User-committee mailing list User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
_______________________________________________ User-committee mailing list User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20130403/77450b26/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the User-committee mailing list