Open Stack

On 12/02/2014 02:18 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> There is something still wrong with OpenDaylight CI.
> I reviewed the latest jenkins jobs where it passed:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137493/
> 
> And it seems that CI is fine but it is reporting in gerrit under your name
> instead of OpenDaylight CI.
> 
> For instance, if you see: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113339/
> 
> All the way until Patch 4, the logs were reported as OpenDaylight CI but
> after patch 5 (probably when you introduced your latest changes) it is now
> reporting as Andrew Grimberg
> 
> Please, modify it.
Edgar:

He made that change to demonstrate CI fitness when his system was
disabled. I was only meant for that means and should not be reporting on
patches as Andrew Grimberg.

If this is the only blocker, please let me know so we can re-enable the
account.

Using your personal account to demonstrate CI fitness should never be
used to comment on patches. You should only use the new ci-sandbox repo
or the patches Edgar has for testing cis.

Thank you,
Anita.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Edgar
> 
> On 12/2/14, 10:04 AM, "Andrew Grimberg" <agrimberg at linuxfoundation.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> Greetings folks,
>>
>> Just trying to get this loop closed off so that I can switch our CI back
>> to the proper key for doing validation. Is there anything we still need
>> to do to get the rights turned back on?
>>
>> -Andy-
>>
>> On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 16:05 +0000, Edgar Magana wrote:
>>> Please, see my comments about the patch. We can continue the
>>> communication
>>> on gerrit.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Edgar
>>>
>>> On 11/24/14, 7:45 AM, "Kyle Mestery" <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Copying Andy as well.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Kyle Mestery <mestery at mestery.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Edgar Magana
>>>>> <edgar.magana at workday.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Andy and Kyle,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Once the patch [1] is merged, we can re-verify ODL CI and then
>>> deciding
>>>>>> about the re-enable part.
>>>>>> At this moment ODL CI is even failing for your patch.
>>>>>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/ovsdb/job/openstack-gerrit/2782/
>>>>>>
>>>>> Edgar, the patch in question is now passed, we fixed the issues with
>>>>> the CI now. Can you remove your -1 on the devstack patch [1]? Once
>>>>> htat merges, I think we're good to go to re-enable now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>> Kyle
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134309/
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Edgar
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/21/14, 9:31 AM, "Kyle Mestery" <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Edgar Magana
>>>>>>> <edgar.magana at workday.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> This is bothering me about the tests results:
>>>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/ovsdb/job/openstack-gerrit/2806/art
>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>> act
>>>>>>>> /o
>>>>>>>> dl_tempest_test_list.txt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The status is PASSED when this show a test failed!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Agreed, this is fixed with the more recent version of OpenDaylight
>>>>>>> (Helium.1), which I have a patch up for here [1].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still, this is worth noting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Kyle
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134309/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Edgar
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/21/14, 9:19 AM, "Andrew Grimberg"
>>>>>>>> <agrimberg at linuxfoundation.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 17:16 +0000, Doug Wiegley wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 21, 2014, at 9:57 AM, Andrew Grimberg
>>>>>>>>>> <agrimberg at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 16:44 +0000, Doug Wiegley wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I checked out their CI results, and it's behaving well enough
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>> gerrit access shouldn't be harmful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The test build can be seen off of this review:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/136142/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The only real issue that I saw was that the results link
>>>>>>>>>> doesn't go
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> a logs directory as defined here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting#Log_.26_T
>>>>>>>>>> es
>>>>>>>>>> t_R
>>>>>>>>>> es
>>>>>>>>>> ults_Filesystem_Layout
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Doug,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the link. If the current logs tarball was exploded
>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>> directly on the Jenkins archive links would that be better?
>>> Kyle,
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>> may want to consider modifying the final log archival
>>>>>>>>>> composition of
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> job.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think the common thing to do is to have a post-build step that
>>>>>>>>>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>> your artifacts onto a generic web server somewhere, with
>>> on-the-fly
>>>>>>>>>> decompression enabled if you want to store .gz's, and then link
>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> directory in gerrit, instead of linking to jenkins.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For example, this:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://jenkins.a10cloud.com/job/a10-neutron-tempest/lastSuccessful
>>>>>>>>>> Bu
>>>>>>>>>> ild
>>>>>>>>>> /
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ... becomes a link to this:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://ci.a10cloud.com/logs/a10-neutron-tempest/136248/7/5114/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We're definitely working towards that. Haven't managed to get
>>>>>>>>> everything
>>>>>>>>> in place to handle it though :-/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then again, outside of our integration with OpenStack we haven't
>>> had
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> lot of call for that since our Jenkins is open to the world to see
>>>>>>>>> including how the jobs are configured.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Andy-
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Andrew J Grimberg
>>>>>>>>> Systems Administrator
>>>>>>>>> The Linux Foundation
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Third-party-announce mailing list
>>>>>>>> Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-anno
>>>>>>>> un
>>>>>>>> ce
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Third-party-announce mailing list
>>>>>>> Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
>>>
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-annou
>>>>>>> nc
>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Third-party-announce mailing list
>>>>>> Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announ
>>>>>> ce
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Third-party-announce mailing list
>>>> Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
>>>
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announce
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Andrew J Grimberg
>> Systems Administrator
>> The Linux Foundation
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Third-party-announce mailing list
> Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announce
>