Open Stack

I wanted to follow up on this. Piet what is the best way to:
	*Provide feedback on the Personas
	*Help you get more data/responses to the implied survey to round out the
Personas

Thanks!

Kenny Johnston | Senior Product Manager, Private Cloud | Rackspace
kenny.johnston at rackspace.com | rackspace.com |





On 10/28/15, 8:13 PM, "Kruithof, Piet" <pieter.c.kruithof-jr at hpe.com>
wrote:

>We¹re going to need to go through the list and prioritize.
>
>Piet
>
>On Oct 28, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Shamail
><itzshamail at gmail.com<mailto:itzshamail at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>Hi Hugh,
>
>Thanks for sharing, responses in-line..
>
>Thanks,
>Shamail
>
>On Oct 28, 2015, at 5:09 PM, Hugh Blemings
><hugh at blemings.org<mailto:hugh at blemings.org>> wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>A few notes from the UX Work Session today as there were a couple of
>things that I thought were worth sharing with the broader Product WG
>(hereafter PrWG) community. http://sched.co/4QeL
>
>Etherpad is here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tokyo-ux-research
>
>* Persona Effort *
>Piet noted that the PrWG effort to do User Stories has been valuable, but
>slightly problematic (my word, not his) in that it is a generic "User"
>rather than (say) a specific person/role (sysadmin, operator, dev etc) -
>they can be a bit broad.
>
>The inference being it will be handy to look at how we can eventually map
>these emerging Personas onto User Stories to provide more granularity
>+1 we are already engaged so I would like to hear more on the gap.. Nate
>and I were both at the UX Personas workshop in IBM and agreed that the
>work would align well with user stories.
>
>
>Persona info: 
>https://wiki.openstack.org/w/images/b/b6/Profile_templates_2-1-.pdf
>
>It seems to me that PrWG could usefully review/provide input into the
>different personas defined - I'll investigate how we might do this.
>More reviews are always a good thing!
>
>
>* Horizon UX *
>Some discussion about the overall user experience for Horizon.  As it had
>been topical to some stuff I was doing at work, I put in a note about
>Accessibility related research/improvements.
>
>
>* Surveys *
>Piet asked if there are research needs within PrWG that the UX group can
>assist with - helping validate surveys etc. as an example.
>
>I said I'd run this by the broader group and report.
>
>Hope the above helps, incomplete though I'm sure it is!
>
>Cheers,
>Hugh
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Product-wg mailing list
>Product-wg at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Product-wg at lists.openstack.org>
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>
>_______________________________________________
>Product-wg mailing list
>Product-wg at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Product-wg at lists.openstack.org>
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>
>_______________________________________________
>Product-wg mailing list
>Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg