[Product] FW: User requirements feedback loop

Shamail itzshamail at gmail.com
Mon May 11 15:38:08 UTC 2015


Sorry Carol, thanks for clarification.  Yes, the correct time is Tuesday (5/19) at 2:50PM PT.  

I have a conflict as well.  I will try to make at least the beginning of this meeting though.

Thanks,
Shamail 

> On May 11, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Barrett, Carol L <carol.l.barrett at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> Shamail – I see a session at 2:50 on Tuesday, is that the one you’re referring to? I have a conflict at that time with an Ops Summit session I’m moderating.
> I think it’s important for a couple of folks from the Product Work Group to attend – who can cover this for us?
> 
> Thanks
> Carol
>  
> From: Shamail [mailto:itzshamail at gmail.com] 
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 8:25 AM
> To: Barrett, Carol L
> Cc: product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [Product] FW: User requirements feedback loop
>  
> Hi Carol,
>  
> Agreed. There is a user committee session where this proposal will come up as a topic on Tuesday (5/19) at 1:30P PT.  I will be there is schedule permits.
>  
> Agenda for User Committee Session:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-ops-user-committee 
>  
> The specific topic is "How can we close the feedback loop?"
>  
> Thanks,
> Shamail 
> 
> 
> On May 11, 2015, at 11:10 AM, Barrett, Carol L <carol.l.barrett at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> Seems like many in the community are arriving at the same vision for how we can work together to further the development and consumption of OpenStack. Pls see the link below from the User Committee. I responded and asked for them to join our cross-project working session on Monday.
> 
> Thanks
> Carol
> 
> From: Tim Bell [mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch]
> Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2015 11:48 PM
> To: user-committee at lists.openstack.org; product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: [User-committee] User requirements feedback loop
> 
> 
> Within the user committee, we've been reviewing how the various teams and working groups around operators, end users and ecosystem developers could be structured. In particular, how we can turn the ideas into actionable items and expand the activities given the growth in the user community.
> 
> In preparation for the summit, we would welcome feedback from those interested in the user committee and product working groups on the proposal below before wider circulation. The details are in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/uc-2015
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim, Jon, Subbu and Tom
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
> _______________________________________________
> Product-wg mailing list
> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg


More information about the Product-wg mailing list