Open Stack

That works, should we schedule a meeting on Monday to review notes so that
we can coalesce before the cross-project meeting?


On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Mike Cohen <cohen at noironetworks.com> wrote:

> ok, with me.  Maybe then lets just all assemble separate notes without
> changing the google doc and someone can collate it.
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Shamail <itzshamail at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think that will work.  I'll be traveling most of the day and I was
> planning to download the slides and take an attempt at the summarization.
> I'll share my draft by Monday.  Maybe a few of us can attempt building
> summaries.  This will give us multiple perspectives/summaries to pull from
> for each project before we finalize the ones we can internally agree on
> prior to the cross-project meeting.  Is this okay?
> >
> >
> >
> >> On May 8, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Mike Cohen <cohen at noironetworks.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'll be midway through the airport security.  I try to join for a
> >> portion but cannot be counted on unfortunately.
> >>
> >> The other question is who is going to do the summarizing.  I went
> >> ahead and removed the labels with people's names from slides 9-17.
> >> I've also backed up all of these slides to the end of the preso.
> >>
> >> Shamail / Scott or whoever else wants to edit these.  Go ahead and put
> >> your name in a new label on the slide to show its been done.  Would
> >> that work as a process?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Scott Drennan <
> scottd at nuagenetworks.net> wrote:
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> I like that we’re reviewing with the PTLs - thanks for pushing this
> forward.
> >>> According to
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/CrossProjectMeeting
> >>> it’s at 2100 UTC, which is 1400 PT if I’m doing my math correctly.  I’m
> >>> travelling/in meetings Tuesday afternoon but will try to join for some
> of
> >>> the discussion.
> >>>
> >>> cheers,
> >>> Scott
> >>>
> >>> On May 8, 2015, at 9:20 AM, Mike Cohen <cohen at noironetworks.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ok with me.  We can take a crack at it and see how it goes.
> >>>
> >>> When is the cross project session tuesday? I'm traveling that day so i
> >>> may or may not be able to make it.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Shamail <itzshamail at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> Team, Mike?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On May 8, 2015, at 9:07 AM, Barrett, Carol L <
> carol.l.barrett at intel.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think we should ask for 20 mins and review the Summary. I'm concerned
> >>> about getting their mindshare outside of the meeting in the swirl of
> >>> Vancouver prep work going on.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Carol
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Shamail [mailto:itzshamail at gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 8:28 AM
> >>> To: Barrett, Carol L
> >>> Cc: Mike Cohen; product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [Product] Finalizing Glimpse @ Roadmap Session
> >>>
> >>> Hi Carol,
> >>>
> >>> The timeline would work and sounds like a great way for reaching a lot
> of
> >>> PTLs.  Do we want to review the summary or just ask for 5 min to tell
> them
> >>> where to find it and provide feedback directly to us?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Shamail
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On May 8, 2015, at 7:59 AM, Barrett, Carol L <
> carol.l.barrett at intel.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Shamail - I like  your proposed solution. How about we put ourselves
> on the
> >>> cross project session for Tuesday to review? Will that give enough
> time to
> >>> summarize?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Carol
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Shamail [mailto:itzshamail at gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 5:30 PM
> >>> To: Mike Cohen
> >>> Cc: product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [Product] Finalizing Glimpse @ Roadmap Session
> >>>
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I wanted to follow-up on the "roadmap" slides conversation we had
> earlier
> >>> today.  Here are some thoughts to start the discussion via the ML...
> >>>
> >>> There are two approaches and we will need to balance between them.
> >>>
> >>> Problem Statement:
> >>> The way the PTL feedback is documented today is not consumable content
> form
> >>> (no theme, no "why", etc.), but at the same time, paraphrasing could
> put us
> >>> in a situation where we could unintentionally misrepresent their
> intentions.
> >>>
> >>> Proposed Solution:
> >>> We build a new version of the roadmap content that is summarized and
> >>> provides "themes" or the "why" and we ask the PTLs to review the
> paraphrased
> >>> version and approve it prior to the summit.  This would have to be
> done by
> >>> next week.
> >>>
> >>> Alternative Plan:
> >>> We also keep a version of the roadmap that is the same content on the
> >>> roadmap as today.  If we can't get PTL responses in time then we move
> >>> forward with this version.
> >>>
> >>> Summary:
> >>> Roadmap focus would be good for session #1 and paraphrasing would be
> >>> beneficial.  If we can't get PTLs to review our modified version then
> we
> >>> have to move forward with the alternative plan.
> >>>
> >>> I'll take an initial shot at summarizing the current feedback.  I'll
> share
> >>> my progress with the team no later than Monday.  We can modify the
> summary
> >>> as a team afterwards.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Shamail
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On May 7, 2015, at 3:46 PM, Mike Cohen <cohen at noironetworks.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> A few of us got on the phone today and discussed having a final
> >>> meeting to finalize the presentation flow for the Monday session.  We
> >>> are largely there on content but really still have to nail down the
> >>> presenters and finalize things. We also still have to finalize how to
> >>> split things with the second session.
> >>>
> >>> I am proposing doing this at 9am PT Thurs 5/14.  I've set it up as a
> >>> webex so we can review the PPT version of the slides Shamail has been
> >>> gracious enough to build from our Google doc (note please don't add
> >>> to the google doc without telling him from here on out).
> >>> If the time is not good for anyone who wants to be involved, you can
> >>> speak up on this thread as well.
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Thursday 5/14 9am PT
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------
> >>> Meeting Number: 204504435
> >>>
> >>> Meeting Password: product-wg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> To join this meeting (Now from mobile devices!)
> >>>
> >>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> 1. Go to
> >>> https://cisco.webex.com/cisco/j.php?MTID=m2639deaaad7b11928afb345a964
> >>> b
> >>> 859c
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2. Enter the meeting password: product-wg
> >>>
> >>> 3. Click 'Join Now'.
> >>>
> >>> 4. Follow the instructions that appear on your screen.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> ALERT:Toll-Free Dial Restrictions for (408) and (919) Area Codes
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The affected toll free numbers are: (866) 432-9903 for the San
> >>> Jose/Milpitas area and (866) 349-3520 for the RTP area.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please dial the local access number for your area from the list below:
> >>>
> >>> - San Jose/Milpitas (408) area: 525-6800
> >>>
> >>> - RTP (919) area: 392-3330
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> To join the teleconference only
> >>>
> >>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> 1. Dial into Cisco WebEx (view all Global Access Numbers at
> >>> http://cisco.com/en/US/about/doing_business/conferencing/index.html)
> >>>
> >>> 2. Follow the prompts to enter the Meeting Number (listed above) or
> >>> Access Code followed by the # sign.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> San Jose, CA: +1.408.525.6800
> >>>
> >>> RTP: +1.919.392.3330
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> US/Canada: +1.866.432.9903
> >>>
> >>> United Kingdom: +44.20.8824.0117
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> India: +91.80.4350.1111
> >>>
> >>> Germany: +49.619.6773.9002
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Japan: +81.3.5763.9394
> >>>
> >>> China: +86.10.8515.5666
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> http://www.webex.com
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Product-wg mailing list
> >>> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Product-wg mailing list
> >>> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Product-wg mailing list
> >>> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
> >>>
> >>>
>



-- 
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
Cloud Architect, EMC
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time