Open Stack

I think that will work.  I'll be traveling most of the day and I was planning to download the slides and take an attempt at the summarization.  I'll share my draft by Monday.  Maybe a few of us can attempt building summaries.  This will give us multiple perspectives/summaries to pull from for each project before we finalize the ones we can internally agree on prior to the cross-project meeting.  Is this okay?



> On May 8, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Mike Cohen <cohen at noironetworks.com> wrote:
> 
> I'll be midway through the airport security.  I try to join for a
> portion but cannot be counted on unfortunately.
> 
> The other question is who is going to do the summarizing.  I went
> ahead and removed the labels with people's names from slides 9-17.
> I've also backed up all of these slides to the end of the preso.
> 
> Shamail / Scott or whoever else wants to edit these.  Go ahead and put
> your name in a new label on the slide to show its been done.  Would
> that work as a process?
> 
> 
> 
>> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Scott Drennan <scottd at nuagenetworks.net> wrote:
>> +1
>> 
>> I like that we’re reviewing with the PTLs - thanks for pushing this forward.
>> According to https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/CrossProjectMeeting
>> it’s at 2100 UTC, which is 1400 PT if I’m doing my math correctly.  I’m
>> travelling/in meetings Tuesday afternoon but will try to join for some of
>> the discussion.
>> 
>> cheers,
>> Scott
>> 
>> On May 8, 2015, at 9:20 AM, Mike Cohen <cohen at noironetworks.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Ok with me.  We can take a crack at it and see how it goes.
>> 
>> When is the cross project session tuesday? I'm traveling that day so i
>> may or may not be able to make it.
>> 
>> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Shamail <itzshamail at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Team, Mike?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On May 8, 2015, at 9:07 AM, Barrett, Carol L <carol.l.barrett at intel.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> I think we should ask for 20 mins and review the Summary. I'm concerned
>> about getting their mindshare outside of the meeting in the swirl of
>> Vancouver prep work going on.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Carol
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Shamail [mailto:itzshamail at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 8:28 AM
>> To: Barrett, Carol L
>> Cc: Mike Cohen; product-wg at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [Product] Finalizing Glimpse @ Roadmap Session
>> 
>> Hi Carol,
>> 
>> The timeline would work and sounds like a great way for reaching a lot of
>> PTLs.  Do we want to review the summary or just ask for 5 min to tell them
>> where to find it and provide feedback directly to us?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Shamail
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On May 8, 2015, at 7:59 AM, Barrett, Carol L <carol.l.barrett at intel.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Shamail - I like  your proposed solution. How about we put ourselves on the
>> cross project session for Tuesday to review? Will that give enough time to
>> summarize?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Carol
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Shamail [mailto:itzshamail at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 5:30 PM
>> To: Mike Cohen
>> Cc: product-wg at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [Product] Finalizing Glimpse @ Roadmap Session
>> 
>> Hi everyone,
>> 
>> I wanted to follow-up on the "roadmap" slides conversation we had earlier
>> today.  Here are some thoughts to start the discussion via the ML...
>> 
>> There are two approaches and we will need to balance between them.
>> 
>> Problem Statement:
>> The way the PTL feedback is documented today is not consumable content form
>> (no theme, no "why", etc.), but at the same time, paraphrasing could put us
>> in a situation where we could unintentionally misrepresent their intentions.
>> 
>> Proposed Solution:
>> We build a new version of the roadmap content that is summarized and
>> provides "themes" or the "why" and we ask the PTLs to review the paraphrased
>> version and approve it prior to the summit.  This would have to be done by
>> next week.
>> 
>> Alternative Plan:
>> We also keep a version of the roadmap that is the same content on the
>> roadmap as today.  If we can't get PTL responses in time then we move
>> forward with this version.
>> 
>> Summary:
>> Roadmap focus would be good for session #1 and paraphrasing would be
>> beneficial.  If we can't get PTLs to review our modified version then we
>> have to move forward with the alternative plan.
>> 
>> I'll take an initial shot at summarizing the current feedback.  I'll share
>> my progress with the team no later than Monday.  We can modify the summary
>> as a team afterwards.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Shamail
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On May 7, 2015, at 3:46 PM, Mike Cohen <cohen at noironetworks.com> wrote:
>> 
>> A few of us got on the phone today and discussed having a final
>> meeting to finalize the presentation flow for the Monday session.  We
>> are largely there on content but really still have to nail down the
>> presenters and finalize things. We also still have to finalize how to
>> split things with the second session.
>> 
>> I am proposing doing this at 9am PT Thurs 5/14.  I've set it up as a
>> webex so we can review the PPT version of the slides Shamail has been
>> gracious enough to build from our Google doc (note please don't add
>> to the google doc without telling him from here on out).
>> If the time is not good for anyone who wants to be involved, you can
>> speak up on this thread as well.
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Thursday 5/14 9am PT
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> Meeting Number: 204504435
>> 
>> Meeting Password: product-wg
>> 
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> To join this meeting (Now from mobile devices!)
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> 1. Go to
>> https://cisco.webex.com/cisco/j.php?MTID=m2639deaaad7b11928afb345a964
>> b
>> 859c
>> 
>> 
>> 2. Enter the meeting password: product-wg
>> 
>> 3. Click 'Join Now'.
>> 
>> 4. Follow the instructions that appear on your screen.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> ALERT:Toll-Free Dial Restrictions for (408) and (919) Area Codes
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> The affected toll free numbers are: (866) 432-9903 for the San
>> Jose/Milpitas area and (866) 349-3520 for the RTP area.
>> 
>> 
>> Please dial the local access number for your area from the list below:
>> 
>> - San Jose/Milpitas (408) area: 525-6800
>> 
>> - RTP (919) area: 392-3330
>> 
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> To join the teleconference only
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> 1. Dial into Cisco WebEx (view all Global Access Numbers at
>> http://cisco.com/en/US/about/doing_business/conferencing/index.html)
>> 
>> 2. Follow the prompts to enter the Meeting Number (listed above) or
>> Access Code followed by the # sign.
>> 
>> 
>> San Jose, CA: +1.408.525.6800
>> 
>> RTP: +1.919.392.3330
>> 
>> 
>> US/Canada: +1.866.432.9903
>> 
>> United Kingdom: +44.20.8824.0117
>> 
>> 
>> India: +91.80.4350.1111
>> 
>> Germany: +49.619.6773.9002
>> 
>> 
>> Japan: +81.3.5763.9394
>> 
>> China: +86.10.8515.5666
>> 
>> 
>> http://www.webex.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Product-wg mailing list
>> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Product-wg mailing list
>> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Product-wg mailing list
>> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>> 
>>