Open Stack

Has the team done a post-mortem to understand how accurate the current
roadmap is? Now I'm even more concerned this is being published somewhere
where it will be referenced without being up to date. I can already tell
you the Neutron information is quite stale. It's possible we're the most
mismanaged project out there (or maybe not), but my money says the others
are stale as well. If this information is going to be displayed publicly
and referenced by many, I think it needs to be combed over a bit more. In
addition, it would be good for someone on this list to email openstack-dev
and indicate this as well. I didn't realize how widespread this 6 month old
roadmap info was going to be shared, and I'm guessing I'm not the only one.

Thanks,
Kyle

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Shamail <itzshamail at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Kyle,
>
> I was just about to craft a response as well....
>
> We will be refreshing the roadmaps, timing/cadence for regular updates is
> TBD.
> We will also be working with the Foundation to publish the roadmap in an
> accessible place.
>
> The priority between now and next summit is on refining the workflow for
> gathering and socializing requirements.
>
> It's a good point though.  We do need to refresh the information we've
> collected so far...
>
> Thanks,
> Shamail
>
> > On Jun 1, 2015, at 5:18 PM, Barrett, Carol L <carol.l.barrett at intel.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kyle – Attached is the deck that we used for the Summit, which we
> reviewed with the PTLs in the cross-project meeting on May 12th.  We
> haven’t created an update yet, but will as the dust settles from the design
> summit. We do have a process in development (also slides attached from the
> summit talks):
> > - to provide info into the design summits
> > - update roadmaps post- design summits
> > - update roadmaps based upon released projects
> >
> > Thanks
> > Carol
> >
> >
> > From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mestery at mestery.com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 12:05 PM
> > To: Haselmaier, James
> > Cc: Barrett, Carol L; product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> > Subject: Re: [Product] [OpenStack][Product Work Group]
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Haselmaier, James <
> James.Haselmaier at emc.com<mailto:James.Haselmaier at emc.com>> wrote:
> > My $.02:  I think we need to continuously remind people of the message
> > that, while we¹re trying to bring the voice of customers/operators into
> > the planning process, we are NOT looking to implement any sort of effort
> > to control or dictate development decisions or final decisions as to what
> > makes it into the software or not.  That governance/voting/PTL process
> > that has existed and is in place today is not being changed.  And that
> the
> > Product WG¹s expectation is that we will work very closely with the
> > project teams to ensure this input is well understood.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
> > These are all valid and good points Jim. I'm also wondering if the
> Product group has updated their "Roadmap" slides since the last time
> they've spoken to the PTLs. That was 6 months ago, which is a veritable
> lifetime in OpenStack. I'd hate for outdated information to be relayed
> through these types of channels. Along these lines, does the product group
> have a plan to keep the roadmap information updated and current?
> > Thanks,
> > Kyle
> >
> >> On 6/1/15, 12:28 PM, "Barrett, Carol L" <carol.l.barrett at intel.com
> <mailto:carol.l.barrett at intel.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Team - I am going to participate in a podcast by NextCast tomorrow.
> My
> >> focus will be talking about the Product Work Group and bringing the
> voice
> >> of customers/operators into OpenStack planning. I'm planning to use the
> >> slide decks from the Summit - both the roadmap as well as the planning
> >> process. If you have any thoughts on points for me to emphasize or
> avoid,
> >> would appreciate if you would send along.
> >>
> >> Here's the info on the podcast:
> >>
> http://www.nextcast.net/openstackpod-events/carol-barrett-data-center-plan
> >> ning-at-intel-on-ospod
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Carol
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Product-wg mailing list
> >> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Product-wg at lists.openstack.org>
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Product-wg mailing list
> > Product-wg at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Product-wg at lists.openstack.org>
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Product-wg mailing list
> > Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>