Open Stack

+1 

Thanks again Geoff!




> On Jul 10, 2015, at 3:37 AM, Geoff Arnold <geoff at geoffarnold.com> wrote:
> 
> Based on the original poll and discussion, I don’t think we really need another Doodle poll — and time is of the essence. I propose that we hold the ProductWG Meetup in San Jose on August 20-21, following the Ops Meetup in Palo Alto on August 18-19. If there are any strong objections, please email me immediately. On Friday I’ll kick off the logistics in Cisco for hosting it. Based on the new location, I suspect we may have more attendees than we would have got in Texas, so I’m going to look for a room for 30 people with a nearby breakout room for 15.
> 
> I’ve updated the Wiki page at
> 
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/Product_WGLibertySprint <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/Product_WGLibertySprint>
> 
> Please visit this page and edit your information as necessary.
> 
> Geoff
> 
>> On Jul 9, 2015, at 2:12 PM, Barrett, Carol L <carol.l.barrett at intel.com> wrote:
>> 
>> My 2 cents: I think there is good value in co-locating with the Ops Meet-up. Where Product Work Group folks would attend the Ops sessions to gather requirements and then we'd have the Product Work Group Meetup the 2 days (8/13 & 14) afterwards.
>> 
>> Carol
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hugh Blemings [mailto:hugh at blemings.org] 
>> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 1:52 PM
>> To: Kenny Johnston; Rochelle Grober; Geoff Arnold; product-wg at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [Product] Right after we set up the ProductWG meetup, the Operators Meetup is finalized
>> 
>>> On 10/07/2015 6:30, Kenny Johnston wrote:
>>> I was planning on attending in Dallas but I¹m happy to adjust to align 
>>> with the Operators Meetup.
>> 
>> Likewise - my travel is still in booking stage so can be changed with little ado.
>> 
>> I wonder is there any merit in trying for the same location as the Operators Meetup to avoid some people having to change location between the two ?
>> 
>> Quick poll might be the go as Shamail suggested, but in the absence of that you have my vote to move if that's the majority view :)
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Hugh
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Product-wg mailing list
>> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Product-wg mailing list
> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg