Open Stack

Quick question...

If there is only one user-stories repo then isn't having OpenStack/openstack-user-stories unnecessarily long?  What do you think about OpenStack/user-stories?

Thanks,
Shamail 



> On Jul 6, 2015, at 10:26 PM, Rochelle Grober <rochelle.grober at huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Hey, folks.
> 
> The Product Working Group is in the process of trying to get a repository instantiated for User Stories (hopefully at openstack/openstack-user-stories) and in the process of walking through the process, found it would be much simpler to actually form a project that owns the repository.  Once that was realized, it was suggested (thanks Thierry!) that the likely best location for us would be under the auspices of the User Committee.
> 
> With the committee's ok, I'd like to modify the current patch commit message, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/197754/ to read:
> 
> "The Product Working group would like to be formally recognized as a project within the User Committee governance body."
> 
> And would change the file to be modified to be the openstack/governance/reference/user-committee-repos.yaml with the group's information.
> 
> What do you guys think?  The patch is under discussion at tomorrow's meeting, but if I get a generally positive response from the list, I will be able to at least propose that the current patch be abandoned for one that puts the Product WG under the auspices of the User Committee.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rocky Grober (on behalf of the Product Working Group)
> _______________________________________________
> Product-wg mailing list
> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg