[Product] Time to Pick Topics

Mike Cohen cohen at noironetworks.com
Tue Jan 20 18:03:29 UTC 2015


Ideas I've heard on this thread that I would vote for:

- rob on defcore / revstack. , Should cover broader governance changes for
projects here or in an adjacent session.
- multi-release strategy / long term vision (maybe randy?)
- Discussion on what the goals of this group are / what charter is.
Doesn't seem we've closed on this over email.
- Use Cases / Key gaps in OpenStack that need to be filled
- Overview / Review of what operators group is doing / has done (for
background for everyone)


On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Rochelle Grober <rochelle.grober at huawei.com
> wrote:

>
>
> sean roberts [mailto:seanroberts66 at gmail.com], Monday, January 19, 2015
> 1:18 PM wrote:
>
>
> The win the enterprise group continues to come up with use cases. It's
> working on adding filling gaps in the docs as well.
>
> Between the operator, win the enterprise groups, this subteam would
> isolate and test out those use cases and publish the results?
> [Rockyg]
> Excellent question.  I think it would be really useful to have/get a quick
> overview of these non-developer groups and their charter/mission.  I was
> under the impression that the win the enterprise group was a cross between
> product marketing and product management?  Not sure.
>
> My thoughts on the reference architecture team(s) would be that as a cross
> project group, they could identify/specify architectures based on use
> cases, then work together to define, document, automate installation and
> interop testing and publish all of the generated information.
>
> I think, after the initial implement/document/publish cycle, the hardest
> part will be updating for every OpenStack release.  And, if the devs get
> the upgrade process correct, then it might mostly be documenting the new
> and deprecated features.
>
> The key take away here is that there should be a less than one day process
> for any of the endusers to install a small multimode cloud for their own
> purposes, similar to what devstack does for devs.  And for endusers, it
> needs to be extremely well documented.
>
> This could even be used in training courses for the lab work phases.
>
> --Rocky
>
> On Monday, January 19, 2015, Rochelle Grober <rochelle.grober at huawei.com
> <mailto:rochelle.grober at huawei.com>> wrote:
> I believe Rob Hirschfeld will be in attendance so, Rob (and I if he wants
> me) can cover the DefCore and Refstack session.  Rob is certainly the
> expert on DefCore.
>
> I'd also like to propose a session on defining/finding a project manager
> to start creating some reference architectures with tested installs.  Right
> now there is a discussion on the Operators' list on a small installation,
> 3-5 nodes, with HA.  This could be a fine first reference architecture with
> all the code and docs to make it similar (or better) to install than
> devstack.  This is also a good architecture for prospective users for
> prototyping, testing, or small business installation.  Spec'ing this out
> during the summit, or at least getting a good start, along with a volunteer
> project manager, would be a very worthwhile endeavor for the meetup.
>
> --Rocky
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sean roberts [mailto:seanroberts66 at gmail.com<javascript:;>]
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 11:44 AM
> To: product-wg at lists.openstack.org<javascript:;>
> Subject: [Product] Time to Pick Topics
>
> It’s time to finalize the OpenStack Product Management topics for the Kilo
> midcycle meeting
> <
> http://sarob.com/2015/01/openstack-kilo-product-management-midcycle-coming-to-a-greater-understanding/
> >
> coming
> up. We will need speakers for each topic. I want to get the best authority
> possible for each talk, so locking down the topics is required. I will need
> to get their commitment as soon as possible.
>
> More details on this post
>
> http://sarob.com/2015/01/getting-ready-for-the-product-management-kilo-midcycle/
>
>
> --
> ~sean
> _______________________________________________
> Product-wg mailing list
> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org<javascript:;>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>
>
> --
> ~sean
> _______________________________________________
> Product-wg mailing list
> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>


More information about the Product-wg mailing list