Open Stack

Don't forget the log working group.  [log] in dev and ops list.

-----Original Message-----
From: Shamail Tahir [mailto:itzshamail at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 10:22
To: Geoff Arnold
Cc: product-wg at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Product] [OpenStack][Product-WG] Email Draft for Vancouver Summit working session

Hi everyone,

Here are the WGs I know about, pls add others:
> Win The Enterprise
> Telco (don't have a dedicated ML, use the dev list)
> HPC (OpenStack-HPC)
> Security (OpenStack-security)
The only other one that I would add would be:  API WG (doesn't have a
dedicated ML, use the dev list with [API] tag)

Geoff, we do have a cross working-group meeting planned for Vancouver (our
second session) and WTE will definitely be represented.  Carol has been
doing a great job of keeping WTE updated on our progress and collaboration
opportunities.

Thanks,
Shamail



On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Geoff Arnold <geoff at geoffarnold.com> wrote:

> Definitely add Win the Enterprise.
>
> I talked to Eric Saxe of Oracle at a Meetup yesterday, and we talked about
> how WtE and product-wg could work together. We assumed that you’d be
> driving that, Carol, in view of your participation in both, but Eric did
> feel that it might be useful to have a joint session at some point - either
> IRC or at the summit.
>
> Geoff
>
> > On Apr 30, 2015, at 10:08 AM, Barrett, Carol L <
> carol.l.barrett at intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Good Idea Shamail. Here are the WGs I know about, pls add others:
> > Win The Enterprise
> > Telco (don't have a dedicated ML, use the dev list)
> > HPC (OpenStack-HPC)
> > Security (OpenStack-security)
> >
> > I could also include OpenStack general mailing list .
> >
> > Thanks
> > Carol
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shamail [mailto:itzshamail at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 9:32 AM
> > To: Barrett, Carol L
> > Cc: product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> > Subject: Re: [Product] [OpenStack][Product-WG] Email Draft for Vancouver
> Summit working session
> >
> > Hi Carol,
> >
> > I think those are probably the right mailing lists.  Do we want to
> include the WG mailing lists explicitly?  I think you will get to the same
> people through the MLs mentioned below but will it be more relevant for the
> WGs if they see themselves on the "to:" list?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shamail
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Apr 30, 2015, at 11:27 AM, Barrett, Carol L <
> carol.l.barrett at intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I want to confirm the mailing list that we want to send this to. My
> plan is to send to OpenStack-dev, Marketing, user-committee,
> openstack-operators.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >> Thanks
> >> Carol
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Shamail [mailto:itzshamail at gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 4:46 PM
> >> To: Barrett, Carol L
> >> Cc: product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Product] [OpenStack][Product-WG] Email Draft for
> Vancouver Summit working session
> >>
> >> Hi Carol,
> >>
> >> This looks great.  We should add specific details (if available) before
> sending out the message for the working session (date/time, room #, etc.)
> >>
> >> Which etherpad are you directly people to?  I couldn't find the link
> but let's make it a new one (e.g. ProductWGVancouverMeetup) since our
> existing ones are becoming hard to manage.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shamail
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Apr 6, 2015, at 12:01 PM, Barrett, Carol L <
> carol.l.barrett at intel.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> All  - In our last team meeting, I took the AR to draft an email to
> send to the OpenStack community to invite and identify community groups
> that are synergistic with our efforts to develop a multi-release roadmap to
> our working session at the Vancouver Summit. Pls help improve this
> communication by reviewing and editing  this draft by 4/13, so we can
> finalize in our 4/15 team meeting and send out to the community by 4/17.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Carol
> >>>
> >>> Email Draft:
> >>>
> >>> The Product Work Group has formed to listen and aggregate feedback on
> the desired capabilities for the OpenStack platform from developer
> community (including PTLs), Customers, and Users. Using this feedback we
> intent to help PTLs and Contributors resolve issues that are either of
> strategic importance or have broad implications across OpenStack services
> that will help customers/users be successful with adoption by removing
> barriers to adoption/operation.
> >>>
> >>> To achieve this goal, we are striving to create a multi-release
> OpenStack roadmap based upon the aggregated information through an open,
> transparent, cross-community collaboration.
> >>>
> >>> In a working session at the Vancouver Summit, we'd like to refine and
> finalize our approach to creating this roadmap. We'd like to understand
> what work groups, user groups or community members are interested in
> joining us for this session. Please go to this etherpad to tell us who you
> are and what you're area of interest is.
> >>>
> >>> You can find more information about the Product work group here:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ProductTeam
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Product-wg mailing list
> >>> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Product-wg mailing list
> > Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>
>


-- 
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
Cloud Architect, EMC
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time
_______________________________________________
Product-wg mailing list
Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg