Open Stack

Makes sense, hard to move forward without that but let's make sure the
people in our WG have seen/reviewed the message at least.

Agenda updated: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/product-team


On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Barrett, Carol L <carol.l.barrett at intel.com
> wrote:

>  Thanks Shamail.
>
>
>
> On the Community Email, I’m waiting on info from the Foundation folks
> about rooms and times to complete it. More feedback would be good too.
>
> Carol
>
>
>
> *From:* Shamail Tahir [mailto:itzshamail at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 15, 2015 10:31 AM
> *To:* Barrett, Carol L
> *Cc:* product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Product] [Product Work Group] Today's Meeting Agenda
>
>
>
> Hi Carol,
>
>
>
> Thanks, I am updating the agenda to reflect these items.  I am also going
> to add another item regarding the planning of the OpenStack breakout
> session being led by Mike and to review the draft email you had put
> together to raise awareness about our session in Vancouver and working
> group in general.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shamail
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Barrett, Carol L <
> carol.l.barrett at intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All - We're on for our team meeting via IRC today at 4:00PM Pacific.
> Here's the agenda we discussed in our last team meeting:
> Review Socialization Status and Next Steps: Ceilometer, Trove, Nova
> Review the Summit slides & Decide if we want to schedule a voice call to
> finalize plans and content
>         Product Work group plans
>         Cross-community work group plans (ie. Win The enterprise, Telco,
> etc)
>               Coverage of Ops Summit and Use Case translation
> Revisit meeting day/time if attendance is lower than desired - Doodle?
> Define next steps for reviewing Charter, Process with PTLs at Cross
> Project meeting
>
> Discuss Nova PTL comments on what the Product WG can do to help (I think
> these comments are at the heart of our challenge):
>       We implement the features developers are willing to work on. Given
> 100% of our developers are donated, effectively we implement the things
> that are important to Nova from a reliability perspective, and features
> that donor companies need / want. That means that we've never really had a
> long term road map process, and even if we did I can't force people to
> actually implement those things. I'd be interested in ideas of how to fix
> that. Does the foundation intend to fund devs to work on road map features?
> Or do we have other companies willing to donate devs to get those things
> done?"
>
> You can find the etherpad with all of the PTL discussion notes here:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-product-management-socialization
> You can find a slide draft of the roadmap here:
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1t2sGwzybC0CgaJtwI4C26mhMCdC5nimhshxq5WqUaDY/edit?usp=sharing
> You can find a spreadsheet draft of the roadmap here: Can someone add this
> link?
>
> Pls reply with other items you would like to cover in today's meeting.
> Thanks
> Carol
>
> _______________________________________________
> Product-wg mailing list
> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shamail Tahir
>
> Cloud Architect, EMC
>
> t: @ShamailXD
>
> tz: Eastern Time
>



-- 
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
Cloud Architect, EMC
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time