Open Stack

Ah, thanks - but when you say nova may not have set them yet is it at all
possible that it would get set prior to an IPAM request?



[image: --]
Gregory Golberg
[image: http://]about.me/gregorygolberg
<http://about.me/gregorygolberg?promo=email_sig>


On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Kevin Benton <kevin at benton.pub> wrote:

> Nova may not have set them yet. The port is updated with the host ID and
> the device ID separately from the port creation in later Nova versions
> IIRC.
>
> On Apr 10, 2017 10:03, "Gregory Golberg" <grisha at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, that should read host AND instance ID (as the device_id was
>> instance_uuid).
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: --]
>> Gregory Golberg
>> [image: http://]about.me/gregorygolberg
>> <http://about.me/gregorygolberg?promo=email_sig>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Gregory Golberg <grisha at alum.mit.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> In Liberty, port object that got passed into IPAM driver contained
>>> binding:host_id entry (and neutron.ports DB table had a device_id field).
>>> Now it looks like the host_id is not being passed in and device_id field is
>>> empty in the ports table.
>>>
>>> What is the proper way now to look for host in during the IPAM request?
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: --]
>>> Gregory Golberg
>>> [image: http://]about.me/gregorygolberg
>>> <http://about.me/gregorygolberg?promo=email_sig>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi
>> -bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>> Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>> Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi
>> -bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20170410/f12a9863/attachment.html>