Open Stack

Also I should mention our openstack environment is kilo based if that makes
any difference.

Thanks.

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Jagga Soorma <jagga13 at gmail.com> wrote:

> We us a external vm network of 10.36.6.0/23.  Looks like I do have some
> snat rules but no idea what I should be specifically looking for in here:
>
> $ ip netns | grep -i snat
> snat-9e849e49-ed36-4280-a53c-47d6f5afbea2
> snat-716dc7bd-9d6b-41da-aa6a-a484398785b1
> snat-bece0591-c55b-4a48-bc2b-77873a3ebce1
> snat-803e06a4-4499-4ce0-bda6-fb158e717b9e
> snat-6e4669f9-0b63-4b60-bdf6-94037b4c1e23
>
>
> $ sudo ip netns exec snat-9e849e49-ed36-4280-a53c-47d6f5afbea2 ip a | grep
> "inet"
>     inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
>     inet6 ::1/128 scope host
>     inet 192.168.5.4/24 brd 192.168.5.255 scope global sg-86abc456-8d
>     inet6 fe80::f816:3eff:fe23:7166/64 scope link
>     inet 10.36.6.240/23 brd 10.36.7.255 scope global qg-09e400d1-28
>     inet6 fe80::f816:3eff:fe52:dc9a/64 scope link
>
>
> $ sudo ip netns exec snat-bece0591-c55b-4a48-bc2b-77873a3ebce1 ip a | grep
> "inet"
>     inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
>     inet6 ::1/128 scope host
>     inet 192.168.8.4/24 brd 192.168.8.255 scope global sg-ec9b41fe-3b
>     inet6 fe80::f816:3eff:feb5:a225/64 scope link
>     inet 10.36.6.79/23 brd 10.36.7.255 scope global qg-b1f38a3f-0b
>     inet6 fe80::f816:3eff:fe4b:4a1e/64 scope link
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Remo Mattei <remo at italy1.com> wrote:
>
>> not sure how you build your public network.. but usually it does not do
>> dhcp. So those are details that are needed in order for us to give you
>> solutions / options / checking etc based on what you are running, how it
>> was configured etc..
>>
>> CentOS, Ubuntu, scripting just as an example..
>>
>> Remo
>>
>> On May 2, 2016, at 22:02, Jagga <jagga13 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> That is what I thought but it does not seem to be working this way.  How
>> would I check our snat namespace and what specifically should I be looking
>> for?  My apologies but am very new to openstack.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> On May 2, 2016, at 9:51 PM, Dileep Varma Bairraju <varma123 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jagga,
>>
>> I don't think that's the right approach.Floating ip will effectively do a
>> 1:1 NAT for a given a vm to reach external resources. But, there should be
>> a ip from the external network that gets assigned to SNAT namespace on
>> network node, this effectively will let all vm's (without floating ip)
>> access external resources.
>>
>> I'd suggest you check at your snat namespace for possible issues, as you
>> seem to have patched the problem for that vm with floating ip's.
>>
>> > Is that by design or is there something wrong with our configuration?
>> As per design, you don't need to assign floating ip's for your vm's to
>> get out, this should be done by SNAT by default as mentioned earlier, where
>> all the vm's internal ip space maps one external ip.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dileep
>>
>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Jagga Soorma <jagga13 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Guys,
>>>
>>> Need some clarification regarding routing for instances without a
>>> floating ip address. Basically we have instances connected to a priv
>>> network that is also connected to our external network and our security
>>> group allows all egress traffic. However, we can't seem to get to any
>>> resource on our external network till a floating ip address is assigned.
>>> Once we assign a floating ip address we can get out.  Is that by design or
>>> is there something wrong with our configuration?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list:
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>> Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>>> Unsubscribe :
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Dileep V Bairraju
>>
>> !DSPAM:1,572831b2317776163816806!
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list:
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>> Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>> Unsubscribe :
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>
>>
>> !DSPAM:1,572831b2317776163816806!
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20160502/df008702/attachment.html>