[Openstack] Combining compute and network node KILO

BUTTS, Darren (Darren)** CTR ** darren.butts at alcatel-lucent.com
Tue Jun 30 09:15:58 UTC 2015


Thanks all !

Out of interest would it be a simple case of following the implementation of nova-networking but using neutron instead ? Neutron network server by default gets configured to use GRE but obviously this isn’t needed as it would just be routing directly out of the interfaces. Would anyone have any example configurations of configuring the neutron server on a compute node ?

Darren

From: italy1 [mailto:remo at italy1.com]
Sent: 26 June 2015 19:01
To: Kevin Benton; Jonathan Proulx
Cc: openstack at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Combining compute and network node KILO

Yes it does not matter it will be fine
Inviato da iPhone



On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:49 AM -0700, "Jonathan Proulx" <jon at jonproulx.com<mailto:jon at jonproulx.com>> wrote:

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Kevin Benton  wrote:

> Yes, networking functions don't conflict with compute functions.



This is true but it is different that the legacy nova-compute multi

host where network functions for VMs on a physical node were handled

by the network service on that same node neutron has not had that

sense of locality to my knowledge, so if you have assumptions based on

previous nova-network experience you may want to double check them.



If you're building a smallish cluster and want all nodes to be the

same for simplicity and include the 'controller' services so you get

redundancy  without dedicating a significant portion of your hardware

budget to dedicated 'controllers' that makes a lot of sense to me and

should work fine.



-Jon



> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:51 AM, BUTTS, Darren (Darren)** CTR **

>  wrote:

>>

>> All

>>

>>

>>

>> Having setup a configuration with distributed nodes

>>

>>

>>

>> Controller

>>

>> Compute

>>

>> Network

>>

>> Block

>>

>>

>>

>> I am wondering is it possible to configure the system to allow the network

>> and compute nodes to coexist ? I believe this was something that was

>> possible with the legacy networking implementation but not sure if this is

>> something that is supported in Kilo using the Neutron networking function.

>>

>>

>>

>> Any information or guidance is very much appreciated.

>>

>>

>>

>> Darren

>>

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> Mailing list:

>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

>> Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack at lists.openstack.org>

>> Unsubscribe :

>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

>>

>

>

>

> --

> Kevin Benton

>

> _______________________________________________

> Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

> Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack at lists.openstack.org>

> Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

>



_______________________________________________

Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack at lists.openstack.org>

Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack



!DSPAM:1,558d90aa269411417246403!


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20150630/c3ef8f49/attachment.html>


More information about the Openstack mailing list