On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Kevin Benton <blak111 at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, networking functions don't conflict with compute functions. This is true but it is different that the legacy nova-compute multi host where network functions for VMs on a physical node were handled by the network service on that same node neutron has not had that sense of locality to my knowledge, so if you have assumptions based on previous nova-network experience you may want to double check them. If you're building a smallish cluster and want all nodes to be the same for simplicity and include the 'controller' services so you get redundancy without dedicating a significant portion of your hardware budget to dedicated 'controllers' that makes a lot of sense to me and should work fine. -Jon > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:51 AM, BUTTS, Darren (Darren)** CTR ** > <darren.butts at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: >> >> All >> >> >> >> Having setup a configuration with distributed nodes >> >> >> >> Controller >> >> Compute >> >> Network >> >> Block >> >> >> >> I am wondering is it possible to configure the system to allow the network >> and compute nodes to coexist ? I believe this was something that was >> possible with the legacy networking implementation but not sure if this is >> something that is supported in Kilo using the Neutron networking function. >> >> >> >> Any information or guidance is very much appreciated. >> >> >> >> Darren >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org >> Unsubscribe : >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> > > > > -- > Kevin Benton > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org > Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >