Open Stack

help






At 2015-12-25 20:00:03, openstack-request at lists.openstack.org wrote:
>Send Openstack mailing list submissions to
>	openstack at lists.openstack.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>	http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>	openstack-request at lists.openstack.org
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>	openstack-owner at lists.openstack.org
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Openstack digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Cloudkitty pricing- SWIFT (St?phane Albert)
>   2. Re: Pricing for Floating IP - Cloudkitty (St?phane Albert)
>   3. Re: Pricing for Floating IP - Cloudkitty (murali)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 14:35:50 +0100
>From: St?phane Albert <sheeprine-ml at nullplace.com>
>To: murali <muraliselva.10 at gmail.com>
>Cc: openstack at lists.openstack.org
>Subject: Re: [Openstack] Cloudkitty pricing- SWIFT
>Message-ID: <20151224133550.GA7138 at kryptopad>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 04:12:03PM +0530, murali wrote:
>> Hello All,
>> 
>> I need to add the rating option in Cloudkitty based on the Cloud Storage
>> (Swift)
>> 
>> That is based on the Gigabytes used charge is needs to be done.
>> 
>> Is there is any options available for the same?
>> 
>> Could someone le me know your thoughts.?
>Hi,
>
>There is no support for Swift in CloudKitty at the moment, but it should
>be trivial to add it.
>You can modify the ceilometer collector and add a new method reporting
>object storage data. If you want an idea of how to do it, refer to
>existing ones.
>
>Here is the volume (cinder) one:
>https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/cloudkitty/tree/cloudkitty/collector/ceilometer.py#n209
>
>When you are done send the patch to review, so we can add the feature in
>next version.
>
>Thanks
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 14:40:30 +0100
>From: St?phane Albert <sheeprine-ml at nullplace.com>
>To: murali <muraliselva.10 at gmail.com>
>Cc: openstack at lists.openstack.org
>Subject: Re: [Openstack] Pricing for Floating IP - Cloudkitty
>Message-ID: <20151224134030.GC7138 at kryptopad>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:48:45PM +0530, murali wrote:
>> Hello ,
>> 
>> I need to configure price for the floating IP.
>> 
>> I have tried creating the pricing as follows:
>> 
>> First created the service named network.floating.
>> 
>> Then created the group named network.floating.
>> 
>> Have created the service mapping for the same with some cost and pricing
>> type "Flat".
>> 
>> But still it seems not to be working.
>> 
>> I have checked the Db backend for the same to ensure that whether cost for
>> the same is displayed.
>> 
>> It is not displaying the cost for the same.
>Hi,
>
>Even if you're not applying rating rules on floating IPs you should
>still get data inserted in CloudKitty storage backend.
>If you don't get the data in the storage, it's either that the data is
>not in ceilometer or that the service collection is not enabled.
>
>Try to check you configuration parameters and query ceilometer API for
>floating IP information. If your settings are right and ceilometer is
>collecting the data, then open a bug report. We'll try to figure out
>what's not working.
>
>Thanks
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 19:20:40 +0530
>From: murali <muraliselva.10 at gmail.com>
>To: murali <muraliselva.10 at gmail.com>, openstack at lists.openstack.org
>Subject: Re: [Openstack] Pricing for Floating IP - Cloudkitty
>Message-ID:
>	<CAPks-xKA5Xbng69jjBn9-z2kx6H-Vn56wDKb8UWk8H4DFCnTbg at mail.gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>I can be able to find the issue and sort that one out.
>
>Actually there was one modification is needed to done in ceilometer code.
>
>It was not catching non-metric values.
>
>In the following line it was needed to set as False.
>
>https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/notification.py#L52
>
>After that it was working fine as needed.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Murali.
>
>On 24 December 2015 at 19:10, St?phane Albert <sheeprine-ml at nullplace.com>
>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:48:45PM +0530, murali wrote:
>> > Hello ,
>> >
>> > I need to configure price for the floating IP.
>> >
>> > I have tried creating the pricing as follows:
>> >
>> > First created the service named network.floating.
>> >
>> > Then created the group named network.floating.
>> >
>> > Have created the service mapping for the same with some cost and pricing
>> > type "Flat".
>> >
>> > But still it seems not to be working.
>> >
>> > I have checked the Db backend for the same to ensure that whether cost
>> for
>> > the same is displayed.
>> >
>> > It is not displaying the cost for the same.
>> Hi,
>>
>> Even if you're not applying rating rules on floating IPs you should
>> still get data inserted in CloudKitty storage backend.
>> If you don't get the data in the storage, it's either that the data is
>> not in ceilometer or that the service collection is not enabled.
>>
>> Try to check you configuration parameters and query ceilometer API for
>> floating IP information. If your settings are right and ceilometer is
>> collecting the data, then open a bug report. We'll try to figure out
>> what's not working.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>*life s to live....!!!!*
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20151224/9a579eab/attachment-0001.html>
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Openstack mailing list
>openstack at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>
>
>End of Openstack Digest, Vol 30, Issue 22
>*****************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20151226/cc15e9d5/attachment.html>