On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 2:42 PM, John Griffith <john.griffith at solidfire.com> wrote: > > On Apr 5, 2015 2:10 PM, "mad Engineer" <themadengin33r at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Read about cinder multi backend support,for using different backend types. >> I have 2 servers for running as lvm+iscsi back ends. >> Is it possible to use these 2 lvm backend nodes for same volume type and >> schedule block drives between these for that volume type. >> So that volumes will be distributed between these 2 nodes. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org >> Unsubscribe : >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> >> > For sure, if you create without a type specification the weight filter > just places based on available capacity among the backends you configured. > You can also have an LVM type with no backend name > , so you would > Err... that should say "same" backend name. > just > weigh between LVM backend > s > . That's actually the default example shown here > : > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder-multi-backend > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20150405/2c0583f4/attachment.html>