[Openstack] [openstack-dev] [ironic workflow question]
严超
yanchao727 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 4 13:51:47 UTC 2014
Yes, but when you assign a "production" image to an ironic bare metal node.
You should provide *ramdisk_id and kernel_id. *
Should the *ramdisk_id and kernel_id* be the same as deploy images (aka the
first set of k+r) ?
You didn't answer me if the two sets of r + k should be the same ?
*Best Regards!*
*Chao Yan--------------**My twitter:Andy Yan @yanchao727
<https://twitter.com/yanchao727>*
*My Weibo:http://weibo.com/herewearenow
<http://weibo.com/herewearenow>--------------*
2014-06-04 21:27 GMT+08:00 Dmitry Tantsur <dtantsur at redhat.com>:
> On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 21:18 +0800, 严超 wrote:
> > Thank you !
> >
> > I noticed the two sets of k+r in tftp configuration of ironic.
> >
> > Should the two sets be the same k+r ?
> Deploy images are created for you by DevStack/whatever. If you do it by
> hand, you may use diskimage-builder. Currently they are stored in flavor
> metadata, will be stored in node metadata later.
>
> And than you have "production" images that are whatever you want to
> deploy and they are stored in Glance metadata for the instance image.
>
> TFTP configuration should be created automatically, I doubt you should
> change it anyway.
>
> >
> > The first set is defined in the ironic node definition.
> >
> > How do we define the second set correctly ?
> >
> > Best Regards!
> > Chao Yan
> > --------------
> > My twitter:Andy Yan @yanchao727
> > My Weibo:http://weibo.com/herewearenow
> > --------------
> >
> >
> >
> > 2014-06-04 21:00 GMT+08:00 Dmitry Tantsur <dtantsur at redhat.com>:
> > On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 20:29 +0800, 严超 wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thank you very much for your reply !
> > >
> > > But there are still some questions for me. Now I've come to
> > the step
> > > where ironic partitions the disk as you replied.
> > >
> > > Then, how does ironic copies an image ? I know the image
> > comes from
> > > glance. But how to know image is really available when
> > reboot?
> >
> > I don't quite understand your question, what do you mean by
> > "available"?
> > Anyway, before deploying Ironic downloads image from Glance,
> > caches it
> > and just copies to a mounted iSCSI partition (using dd or so).
> >
> > >
> > > And, what are the differences between final kernel (ramdisk)
> > and
> > > original kernel (ramdisk) ?
> >
> > We have 2 sets of kernel+ramdisk:
> > 1. Deploy k+r: these are used only for deploy process itself
> > to provide
> > iSCSI volume and call back to Ironic. There's ongoing effort
> > to create
> > smarted ramdisk, called Ironic Python Agent, but it's WIP.
> > 2. Your k+r as stated in Glance metadata for an image - they
> > will be
> > used for booting after deployment.
> >
> > >
> > > Best Regards!
> > > Chao Yan
> > > --------------
> > > My twitter:Andy Yan @yanchao727
> > > My Weibo:http://weibo.com/herewearenow
> > > --------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2014-06-04 19:36 GMT+08:00 Dmitry Tantsur
> > <dtantsur at redhat.com>:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Workflow is not entirely documented by now AFAIK.
> > After PXE
> > > boots deploy
> > > kernel and ramdisk, it exposes hard drive via iSCSI
> > and
> > > notifies Ironic.
> > > After that Ironic partitions the disk, copies an
> > image and
> > > reboots node
> > > with final kernel and ramdisk.
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 19:20 +0800, 严超 wrote:
> > > > Hi, All:
> > > >
> > > > I searched a lot about how ironic
> > automatically
> > > install image
> > > > on bare metal. But there seems to be no clear
> > workflow out
> > > there.
> > > >
> > > > What I know is, in traditional PXE, a bare
> > metal
> > > pull image
> > > > from PXE server using tftp. In tftp root, there is
> > a ks.conf
> > > which
> > > > tells tftp which image to kick start.
> > > >
> > > > But in ironic there is no ks.conf pointed
> > in tftp.
> > > How do bare
> > > > metal know which image to install ? Is there any
> > clear
> > > workflow where
> > > > I can read ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards!
> > > > Chao Yan
> > > > --------------
> > > > My twitter:Andy Yan @yanchao727
> > > > My Weibo:http://weibo.com/herewearenow
> > > > --------------
> > > >
> > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > > > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > >
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > >
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20140604/33780a2f/attachment.html>
More information about the Openstack
mailing list