[Openstack] Intermittent network connection issue with OVS 1.10.2
Rajshree Thorat
rajshree.thorat at gslab.com
Thu Apr 24 10:32:31 UTC 2014
Hi All,
I have deployed OpenStack Multi node Havana for provisioning VMs using
ESXi as hypervisor.
However, OpenStack instances looses network connectivity every so often.
We could see the ARP reply on the GRE tunnel on the network node, but we
don't see it in the tcpdump
on the 'qr-xxx' interface of the qrouter namespace.For some strange
reason, br-tun does not
pass ARP reply to qr-xxx on network node.
Please find more details below.
ESXi version : 5.5.0
OVS version : 1.10.2
compute1 : 172.16.39.156
compute2 : 172.16.39.155
neutron node : 172.16.39.200
Please find below packet flow when we ping VM from external world and VM
is not reachable.
10.230.39.163 is floating and 10.10.10.2 is private IP of VM.
C:\> ping 10.230.39.163 -t
Pinging 10.230.39.163 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 10.230.39.163: Destination host unreachable.
Reply from 10.230.39.163: Destination host unreachable.
root at compute1:~#tcpdump -n -i eth0 proto gre
17:07:57.541440 IP 172.16.39.155 > 172.16.39.156: GREv0, key=0x1, length
54: ARP, Request who-has 10.10.10.2 tell 10.10.10.1, length 28
17:07:57.541457 IP 172.16.39.156 > 172.16.39.200: GREv0, key=0x1, length
54: ARP, Request who-has 10.10.10.2 tell 10.10.10.1, length 28
17:07:57.541465 IP 172.16.39.156 > 172.16.39.200: GREv0, key=0x1, length
72: ARP, Reply 10.10.10.2 is-at fa:16:3e:ba:22:ff, length 46
17:07:57.541486 IP 172.16.39.156 > 172.16.39.200: GREv0, key=0x1, length
72: ARP, Reply 10.10.10.2 is-at fa:16:3e:ba:22:ff, length 46
Here we can see compute node is sending ARP reply to network node over
gre tunnel.
root at neutron:~#tcpdump -n -i eth0 proto gre
17:08:55.281644 IP 172.16.39.156 > 172.16.39.200: GREv0, key=0x1, length
54: ARP, Request who-has 10.10.10.2 tell 10.10.10.1, length 28
17:08:55.281663 IP 172.16.39.155 > 172.16.39.200: GREv0, key=0x1, length
54: ARP, Request who-has 10.10.10.2 tell 10.10.10.1, length 28
17:08:55.281669 IP 172.16.39.156 > 172.16.39.200: GREv0, key=0x1, length
72: ARP, Reply 10.10.10.2 is-at fa:16:3e:ba:22:ff, length 46
Here we can see network node is receiving ARP reply from compute node
over gre tunnel.
root at neutron:~# tcpdump -i br-int
tcpdump: WARNING: br-int: no IPv4 address assigned
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on br-int, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
17:23:45.344970 ARP, Request who-has 10.10.10.2 tell 10.10.10.1, length 28
17:23:45.345121 ARP, Request who-has 10.10.10.2 tell 10.10.10.1, length 28
We can see only ARP request on br-int of network node. There is no ARP
reply on br-int.
root at neutron:~# ip netns exec
qrouter-905087ce-b1e2-4038-beae-32865fa7924b tcpdump -i qr-8d3a43d5-f5
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on qr-8d3a43d5-f5, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size
65535 bytes
^C23:21:20.950674 ARP, Request who-has 10.10.10.6 tell headnode.hpc.hpc,
length 28
23:21:20.951224 ARP, Request who-has 10.10.10.6 tell headnode.hpc.hpc,
length 28
23:21:20.951237 ARP, Request who-has 10.10.10.6 tell headnode.hpc.hpc,
length 28
23:21:21.949476 ARP, Request who-has 10.10.10.6 tell headnode.hpc.hpc,
length 28
23:21:21.949622 ARP, Request who-has 10.10.10.6 tell headnode.hpc.hpc,
length 28
Here we could not see any ARP reply on qr-xxx.
root at neutron:~# ovs-vsctl show
1f793d03-8ab1-495c-877e-e6002dda9912
Bridge br-ex
Port br-ex
Interface br-ex
type: internal
Port "eth2"
Interface "eth2"
Port "qg-ac77add8-f6"
Interface "qg-ac77add8-f6"
type: internal
Bridge br-tun
Port "gre-1"
Interface "gre-1"
type: gre
options: {in_key=flow, local_ip="172.16.39.200", out_key=flow,
remote_ip="172.16.39.155"}
Port br-tun
Interface br-tun
type: internal
Port "gre-2"
Interface "gre-2"
type: gre
options: {in_key=flow, local_ip="172.16.39.200", out_key=flow,
remote_ip="172.16.39.156"}
Port patch-int
Interface patch-int
type: patch
options: {peer=patch-tun}
Bridge br-int
Port "tapfc47451e-6e"
tag: 2
Interface "tapfc47451e-6e"
type: internal
Port patch-tun
Interface patch-tun
type: patch
options: {peer=patch-int}
Port br-int
Interface br-int
type: internal
Port "qr-9362c080-49"
tag: 1
Interface "qr-9362c080-49"
type: internal
Port "tap494d9d45-de"
tag: 1
Interface "tap494d9d45-de"
type: internal
ovs_version: "1.10.2"
root at neutron:~#
root at neutron:~# ovs-ofctl show br-tun
OFPT_FEATURES_REPLY (xid=0x2): dpid:0000826b075fdc46
n_tables:254, n_buffers:256
capabilities: FLOW_STATS TABLE_STATS PORT_STATS QUEUE_STATS ARP_MATCH_IP
actions: OUTPUT SET_VLAN_VID SET_VLAN_PCP STRIP_VLAN SET_DL_SRC
SET_DL_DST SET_NW_SRC SET_NW_DST SET_NW_TOS SET_TP_SRC SET_TP_DST ENQUEUE
1(patch-int): addr:76:05:50:ec:29:d2
config: 0
state: 0
speed: 0 Mbps now, 0 Mbps max
2(gre-1): addr:32:1d:80:12:a0:c1
config: 0
state: 0
speed: 0 Mbps now, 0 Mbps max
3(gre-2): addr:22:a5:5c:84:bf:66
config: 0
state: 0
speed: 0 Mbps now, 0 Mbps max
LOCAL(br-tun): addr:82:6b:07:5f:dc:46
config: 0
state: 0
speed: 0 Mbps now, 0 Mbps max
OFPT_GET_CONFIG_REPLY (xid=0x4): frags=normal miss_send_len=0
root at neutron:~#
root at neutron:~# ovs-appctl fdb/show br-int
port VLAN MAC Age
-1 1 fa:16:3e:94:4c:19 0
-1 1 fa:16:3e:ba:22:ff 0
root at neutron:~#
root at neutron:~# ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-tun
NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4):
cookie=0x0, duration=50535.216s, table=0, n_packets=34524,
n_bytes=2156153, idle_age=1, priority=1,in_port=3 actions=resubmit(,2)
cookie=0x0, duration=50536.204s, table=0, n_packets=31063,
n_bytes=1773195, idle_age=1, priority=1,in_port=1 actions=resubmit(,1)
cookie=0x0, duration=50535.506s, table=0, n_packets=34472,
n_bytes=2188954, idle_age=1, priority=1,in_port=2 actions=resubmit(,2)
cookie=0x0, duration=50536.169s, table=0, n_packets=4, n_bytes=300,
idle_age=50527, priority=0 actions=drop
cookie=0x0, duration=50536.099s, table=1, n_packets=1880, n_bytes=78960,
idle_age=1, priority=0,dl_dst=01:00:00:00:00:00/01:00:00:00:00:00
actions=resubmit(,21)
cookie=0x0, duration=50536.134s, table=1, n_packets=29183,
n_bytes=1694235, idle_age=1016,
priority=0,dl_dst=00:00:00:00:00:00/01:00:00:00:00:00 actions=resubmit(,20)
cookie=0x0, duration=50534.872s, table=2, n_packets=68996,
n_bytes=4345107, idle_age=1, priority=1,tun_id=0x1
actions=mod_vlan_vid:1,resubmit(,10)
cookie=0x0, duration=50534.678s, table=2, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0,
idle_age=50534, priority=1,tun_id=0x2 actions=mod_vlan_vid:2,resubmit(,10)
cookie=0x0, duration=50536.065s, table=2, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0,
idle_age=50536, priority=0 actions=drop
cookie=0x0, duration=50536.03s, table=3, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0,
idle_age=50536, priority=0 actions=drop
cookie=0x0, duration=50535.995s, table=10, n_packets=68996,
n_bytes=4345107, idle_age=1, priority=1
actions=learn(table=20,hard_timeout=300,priority=1,NXM_OF_VLAN_TCI[0..11],NXM_OF_ETH_DST[]=NXM_OF_ETH_SRC[],load:0->NXM_OF_VLAN_TCI[],load:NXM_NX_TUN_ID[]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[],output:NXM_OF_IN_PORT[]),output:1
This rule gets hit as number of packets increases. Its output port is 1,
it means packet should pass to patch-int and then to qr-xxx. However we
can not see any ARP reply on qr-xxx.
cookie=0x0, duration=1113.575s, table=20, n_packets=5, n_bytes=249,
hard_timeout=300, idle_age=1106, hard_age=0,
priority=1,vlan_tci=0x0001/0x0fff,dl_dst=fa:16:3e:ba:22:ff
actions=load:0->NXM_OF_VLAN_TCI[],load:0x1->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[],output:3
cookie=0x0, duration=1113.575s, table=20, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0,
hard_timeout=300, idle_age=1113, hard_age=0,
priority=1,vlan_tci=0x0001/0x0fff,dl_dst=fa:16:3e:94:4c:19
actions=load:0->NXM_OF_VLAN_TCI[],load:0x1->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[],output:2
cookie=0x0, duration=50535.961s, table=20, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0,
idle_age=50535, priority=0 actions=resubmit(,21)
cookie=0x0, duration=50534.907s, table=21, n_packets=1880,
n_bytes=78960, idle_age=1, priority=1,dl_vlan=1
actions=strip_vlan,set_tunnel:0x1,output:2,output:3
cookie=0x0, duration=50534.713s, table=21, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0,
idle_age=50534, priority=1,dl_vlan=2
actions=strip_vlan,set_tunnel:0x2,output:2,output:3
cookie=0x0, duration=50535.926s, table=21, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0,
idle_age=50535, priority=0 actions=drop
Does anyone have any idea? Why flows on br-tun could not pass ARP reply
packets to qr-xxx.
Any assistance you can provide would be greatly appreciated.
-- Regards,
Rajshree
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20140424/6cf96649/attachment.html>
More information about the Openstack
mailing list