[Openstack] [Ceilometer/Heat/Havana]: Ceilometer statistics not available for custom metrics.
Juha Tynninen
juha.tynninen at tieto.com
Thu Apr 3 11:34:49 UTC 2014
Maybe this is because I didn't fill in instance related metadata (scaling
group name and such) to the REST call I made when adding custom metric data
to Ceilometer. I tried to create metric data again, now with metadata
filled:
$ curl -X POST -H 'X-Auth-Token: 0722fcd0f403425bb8564808c37e8dc8' -H
'Content-Type: application/json' -d '[ { "counter_name": "vm_cpu_load",
"resource_id": "e7eaf484-38b6-4689-8490-40aa8f0df8ae", "resource_metadata"
: { "AutoScalingGroupName": "tykyauto-Group_B-hmknsgn35efz",
"metering.server_group": "Group_B" }, "counter_unit": "%",
"counter_volume": 11, "counter_type": "gauge" } ]'
http://192.168.100.5:8777/v2/meters/vm_cpu_load
...but as a result I can see the following error in ceilometer log:
<43>Apr 3 14:24:01 node-6
ceilometer-ceilometer.collector.dispatcher.database ERROR: Failed to record
metering data: not okForStorage
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ceilometer/collector/dispatcher/database.py",
line 65, in record_metering_data
self.storage_conn.record_metering_data(meter)
File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ceilometer/storage/impl_mongodb.py", line
451, in record_metering_data
upsert=True,
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pymongo/collection.py", line 487,
in update
check_keys, self.__uuid_subtype), safe)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pymongo/mongo_client.py", line
969, in _send_message
rv = self.__check_response_to_last_error(response)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pymongo/mongo_client.py", line
911, in __check_response_to_last_error
raise OperationFailure(details["err"], details["code"])
OperationFailure: not okForStorage
Hmm. What am I doing wrong here?
Thanks,
-Juha
On 2 April 2014 14:04, Juha Tynninen <juha.tynninen at tieto.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sending custom Ceilometer metrics from inside VM instance with REST
> call to
> http://192.168.100.5:8777/v2/meters/vm_cpu_load.
>
> This is successful and I can see the entered metric data with Ceilometer:
>
> # ceilometer sample-list -m vm_cpu_load
> -q="resource_id=91951d0a-9a43-4894-99fb-ac67a1098771" | tail -n +4 | head
> -n -1 | sort -k 12
> ...
> | 91951d0a-9a43-4894-99fb-ac67a1098771 | vm_cpu_load | gauge | 2.6 | %
> | 2014-03-30T19:20:38.080000 |
> | 91951d0a-9a43-4894-99fb-ac67a1098771 | vm_cpu_load | gauge | 3.3 | %
> | 2014-03-30T19:20:58.223000 |
> | 91951d0a-9a43-4894-99fb-ac67a1098771 | vm_cpu_load | gauge | 2.6 | %
> | 2014-03-30T19:21:18.078000 |
> | 91951d0a-9a43-4894-99fb-ac67a1098771 | vm_cpu_load | gauge | 28.6 | %
> | 2014-03-30T19:21:38.894000 |
> | 91951d0a-9a43-4894-99fb-ac67a1098771 | vm_cpu_load | gauge | 1.0 | %
> | 2014-03-30T19:21:59.370000 |
> | 91951d0a-9a43-4894-99fb-ac67a1098771 | vm_cpu_load | gauge | 2.3 | %
> | 2014-03-30T19:22:20.255000 |
> | 91951d0a-9a43-4894-99fb-ac67a1098771 | vm_cpu_load | gauge | 0.3 | %
> | 2014-03-30T19:22:40.351000 |
> | 91951d0a-9a43-4894-99fb-ac67a1098771 | vm_cpu_load | gauge | 1.9 | %
> | 2014-03-30T19:23:00.317000 |
>
> # ceilometer meter-list | grep vm_cpu_load | grep
> 91951d0a-9a43-4894-99fb-ac67a1098771
> | vm_cpu_load | gauge | % |
> 91951d0a-9a43-4894-99fb-ac67a1098771 | 2884e2f624224227bb63d77a040126e6
> | a12aee6f0da04d8d976eb4b761a73e14 |
>
> I've started the instance with a Heat template having AutoScaling defined
> and I'm trying to base the scaling actions to this custom metric.
> The problem is that the autoscaling does not occur.
>
> "Resources" : {
>
> "Group_B" : {
> "Type" : "AWS::AutoScaling::AutoScalingGroup",
> "Properties" : {
> "AvailabilityZones" : { "Fn::GetAZs" : ""},
> "LaunchConfigurationName" : { "Ref" : "Group_B_Config" },
> "MinSize" : "1",
> "MaxSize" : "3",
> "Tags" : [
> { "Key" : "metering.server_group", "Value" : "Group_B" }
> ],
> "VPCZoneIdentifier" : [ { "Ref" : "Private Application
> Subnet ID" } ]
> }
> },
> ...
> "Group_B_Config" : {
> "Type" : "AWS::AutoScaling::LaunchConfiguration",
> "Properties": {
> "ImageId" : { "Ref" : "Image Id" },
> "InstanceType" : { "Ref" : "Instance Type" },
> "KeyName" : { "Ref" : "Key Name" }
> }
> },
> ...
> "CPUAlarmHigh": {
> "Type": "OS::Ceilometer::Alarm",
> "Properties": {
> "description": "Scale-up if CPU is greater than 80% for 60
> seconds",
> "meter_name": "vm_cpu_load",
> "statistic": "avg",
> "period": "60",
> "evaluation_periods": "1",
> "threshold": "80",
> "alarm_actions":
> [ {"Fn::GetAtt": ["ScaleUpPolicy", "AlarmUrl"]} ],
> "matching_metadata":
> {"metadata.user_metadata.server_group": "Group_B" },
> "comparison_operator": "gt",
> "repeat_actions" : true
> }
> },
> ...
>
> nova show 91951d0a-9a43-4894-99fb-ac67a1098771
> ...
> | metadata | { u'AutoScalingGroupName': u'tykyauto-Group_B-76nubm24bnf6',
> u'metering.server_group': u'Group_B'} |
>
> For some reason the statistics query does not return anything when queried
> with the scaling group name, this probably explains why auto scaling
> actions are not triggered...? Without query parameter data is returned.
> Data is returned also ok for some other counter e.g. for cpu_util.
>
> # ceilometer statistics -m vm_cpu_load -q
> metadata.user_metadata.server_group=Group_B -p 60
>
> # ceilometer statistics -m vm_cpu_load
>
> +--------+----------------------------+----------------------------+-------+-----+-------+--------+---------------+------------+----------------------------+----------------------------+
> | Period | Period Start | Period End | Count
> | Min | Max | Sum | Avg | Duration | Duration Start
> | Duration End |
>
> +--------+----------------------------+----------------------------+-------+-----+-------+--------+---------------+------------+----------------------------+----------------------------+
> | 0 | 2014-03-28T21:14:34.370000 | 2014-03-28T21:14:34.370000 | 520
> | 0.3 | 100.0 | 5865.5 | 11.2798076923 | 170135.609 |
> 2014-03-28T21:14:34.370000 | 2014-03-30T20:30:09.979000 |
>
> +--------+----------------------------+----------------------------+-------+-----+-------+--------+---------------+------------+----------------------------+----------------------------+
>
> Any ideas what might be the cause for this behaviour...?
>
> Many thanks,
> -Juha
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20140403/1446a78d/attachment.html>
More information about the Openstack
mailing list