[Openstack] FWaaS vs Security Groups

Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmartinsc at gmail.com
Mon Oct 28 20:58:09 UTC 2013


Guys,

I'm trying to figure out the main differences between FWaaS and "Security
Groups".


* Does it complement each other? Or is FWaaS a "Security Groups"
replacement...?

* Can FWaaS manage the "Tenant Namespace Router NAT Table"?

* Does FWaaS manage the same iptables/ip6tables tables at L3 Namespace
router in which the "Security Groups" already manages too?


For example, two commands to do (almost) the same thing? Like this:

Open TCP port 80:

FWaaS:

neutron firewall-rule-create --protocol tcp --destination-port 80 --action allow


Security Groups:

neutron security-group-rule-create --direction ingress --protocol tcp
--port_range_min 80 --port_range_max 80 <security_group_uuid>


I'm a bit confused about the aims and proposals of each approach /
project...

Thanks!
Thiago
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20131028/15407a8c/attachment.html>


More information about the Openstack mailing list