Open Stack

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Remo Mattei <Remo at mattei.org> wrote:

> the FWaaS is different than Security Groups. It acts on the router port
> whereas Security Groups handles the provider network layer.
>
>
>
What's the difference from the point of view of the end-user? In
particular, when should they use security groups and when should they use
FWaaS? And when there's overlapping functionality, how should they decide
which one to use?


Lorin





> --
> Remo Mattei
>
>
> November 25, 2013 at 7:42:57, Liu Wenmao (marvelliu at gmail.com<//marvelliu at gmail.com>)
> ha scritto:
>
>   Hi all:
>
> I notice that there are two security ACL approaches in neutron: security
> group and FWaaS, both have standard CUPD operations.  why is FWaaS
> *service*, bug security group is not?
>
> I wonder what the definition a service is. thanks
>
> Liu Wenmao
> !DSPAM:2,52935d1a296201044898170!
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list:
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
> Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org
> Unsubscribe :
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>
>
> !DSPAM:2,52935d1a296201044898170!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list:
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org
> Unsubscribe :
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>
>


-- 
Lorin Hochstein
Lead Architect - Cloud Services
Nimbis Services, Inc.
www.nimbisservices.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20131125/8ebc37e0/attachment.html>