[Openstack] Floating IP is wasting IP resources

Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmartinsc at gmail.com
Thu May 2 15:41:48 UTC 2013


Use IPv6... No need for Floating IPs, no NAT tables... Billions * billions
* billions of public IPs for you...  [?]


On 2 May 2013 11:31, Joe Topjian <joe.topjian at cybera.ca> wrote:

> I agree with you. I'd be interested to know if anyone else has run into
> this issue and their solution.
>
> Here's what I'll be trying to implement to get around this:
>
> I have an incoming trunk connection that carries two vlans: a public IP
> subnet and private subnet. I have them configured as two bridges in OVS:
> br-nat (the private subnet) and br-floating (the public subnet).
>
> Right now I have one L3 service working with br-nat. Users can create
> routers, set a default gateway, and get outgoing nat'd access to the
> internet. Since the subnet is private, I can easily configure this L3
> service with a large allocation pool.
>
> Yet to be implemented: the br-floating L3 service. This will be a smaller
> pool that will be restricted via quotas. Users will have to be more
> conservative with access to this service (maybe by creating an instance
> which will act as a port-forwarding firewall to an internal subnet).
>
> This places more work on the user compared to the nova-network vlanmanager
> workflow. However, I feel the ability to create multiple internal
> per-project subnets is a decent tradeoff.
>
> If this doesn't work out or if this ends up being to complicated for
> users, I'll probably go with the "Provider Router with Private Networks"
> use case (
> http://docs.openstack.org/grizzly/openstack-network/admin/content/use_cases_single_router.html
> ).
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:06 AM, 陈雷 <raid.chan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Recently I'm test floating IP on version Grizzly, I found the mechanism
>> of floating IP is a little of wasting public IP addresses.
>>
>> In some circumstance, like public cloud environment. there is only one
>> user in one project (tenant). If the user want to using floating IP,  he
>> has to create an router and set a gateway for it, this process  will occupy
>> one additional public IP address. So the whole process of floating IP will
>> use 2 public address at least.
>>
>> So my question is, are there any ways to avoid this?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ray
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Joe Topjian
> Systems Administrator
> Cybera Inc.
>
> www.cybera.ca
>
> Cybera is a not-for-profit organization that works to spur and support
> innovation, for the economic benefit of Alberta, through the use
> of cyberinfrastructure.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20130502/4b29e126/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 347.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20130502/4b29e126/attachment.gif>


More information about the Openstack mailing list