[Openstack] Tenant Isolation - Virtualbox

Ronivon Costa ronivon.costa at gmail.com
Thu Jan 24 11:25:33 UTC 2013


Hi Vish,

You are right, it was a misunderstanding.
In fact, during in the period of time between my email and you answer, I
managed to setup a test environment to capture packets using tcpdump, and
could verify in loco the tenant isolation at L2.
PS: I have carried out this verification in a physical box, in a
single-server openstack deployment.

Cheers,
Roni.




On 24 January 2013 01:53, Vishvananda Ishaya <vishvananda at gmail.com> wrote:

> There is nothing wrong with your setup. L3 routing is done by the network
> node. L3 is already blocked by security groups. The vlans provide L2
> isolation. Essentially we handle this with convention, as in tell your
> tenants not to open up their firewalls if they don't want to be accessed by
> other tenants.
>
> for example:
>
> nova secgroup-add-rule default tcp 22 22 192.168.0.0/24 # or some other
> restricted range
>
> instead of:
>
> nova secgroup-add-rule default tcp 22 22 0.0.0.0/0
>
> People seem to expect l3 traffic to be totally blocked between tenants.
> I'm not totally convinced that is good behavior, but it should be possible
> to produce a patch that will do this. In fact I've put together a potential
> version here:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/20362/
>
> Unless I've messed something up, with this patch, you should be able to
> set:
>
> bridge_forward_inteface=xxx # where xxx is your public_interface
>
> And get the behavior you expect.
>
> Vish
>
> On Jan 23, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Ronivon Costa <ronivon.costa at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I have just installed Folsom in a physical server, and the tenants can
> also ping and ssh into each others instances.
> I think there is something wrong with my setup.
>
> Below I provide some info from the deployment.
> Any tip will be very much appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
> Roni
>
>
> nova-manage network list
> id   IPv4               IPv6           start address   DNS1           DNS2
>           VlanID         project         uuid
> 1     10.0.0.0/24       None           10.0.0.3       None           None
>           100             c0561ee64e6c40b2aea3bdcf47916f18
> c417baf7-f989-49d9-973d-f6f2b51a2d5c
> 2     10.0.1.0/24       None           10.0.1.3       None           None
>           101             36ae086d927f49039cedfcb046463876
> 4bff308a-7990-46a4-952b-772d4953cb10
>
>
> --
>
> brctl show
>
> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
> br100 8000.fa163e7b7397 no vlan100
> vnet0
> br101 8000.fa163e7baec0 no vlan101
> vnet1
>
> -------
>
> br100     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr fa:16:3e:7b:73:97
>           inet addr:10.0.0.1  Bcast:10.0.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::b016:8dff:fefa:43db/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:531 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:803 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:66890 (66.8 KB)  TX bytes:90421 (90.4 KB)
>
> br101     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr fa:16:3e:7b:ae:c0
>           inet addr:10.0.1.1  Bcast:10.0.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::c41:bbff:fed4:354b/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:422 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:574 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:65212 (65.2 KB)  TX bytes:69840 (69.8 KB)
>
> dummy0    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 02:dc:e1:5c:aa:5e
>           inet6 addr: fe80::dc:e1ff:fe5c:aa5e/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:169 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:23932 (23.9 KB)
>
> dummy1    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 72:2d:2b:59:a2:d1
>           BROADCAST NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
>
> dummy2    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 72:6f:28:d7:e8:cd
>           BROADCAST NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
>
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1a:92:08:1f:47
>           inet addr:10.100.200.126  Bcast:10.100.200.255
>  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::21a:92ff:fe08:1f47/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:210280 errors:1 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:1
>           TX packets:20752 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>           RX bytes:310541700 (310.5 MB)  TX bytes:1983489 (1.9 MB)
>
> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
>           inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>           inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
>           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>           RX packets:91449 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:91449 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:600766448 (600.7 MB)  TX bytes:600766448 (600.7 MB)
>
>  vlan100   Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr fa:16:3e:7b:73:97
>           inet6 addr: fe80::f816:3eff:fe7b:7397/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:71 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:11025 (11.0 KB)
>
> vlan101   Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr fa:16:3e:7b:ae:c0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::f816:3eff:fe7b:aec0/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:95 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:12033 (12.0 KB)
>
> vnet0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr fe:16:3e:7b:0b:14
>           inet6 addr: fe80::fc16:3eff:fe7b:b14/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:531 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:764 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:500
>           RX bytes:74324 (74.3 KB)  TX bytes:84372 (84.3 KB)
>
> vnet1     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr fe:16:3e:5c:99:18
>           inet6 addr: fe80::fc16:3eff:fe5c:9918/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:422 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:520 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:500
>           RX bytes:71120 (71.1 KB)  TX bytes:63161 (63.1 KB)
>
> wlan0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:24:01:12:c8:6b
>           BROADCAST MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
>
>
> On 21 January 2013 11:15, Kevin Jackson <kevin at linuxservices.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi Roni,
>> VirtualBox should honour the VLAN tagging, but it seems its related to
>> the driver type used: e1000 strips the VLAN tag it seems.  I don't recall
>> having this issue, but if I get time I'll be happy to spin an environment
>> up and have a play.
>>
>> See this post:
>> http://humbledown.org/virtualbox-intel-vlan-tag-stripping.xhtml
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kev
>>
>>
>> On 20 January 2013 15:32, Ronivon Costa <ronivon.costa at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am playing with Openstack and VlanManager in a Virtualbox machine. Is
>>> it tenant isolation supposed to work in this setup?
>>>
>>> I have several tenants, and the instances for them have landed on
>>> different subnets (11.0.1.x, 11.0.2.x, 11.0.3.x, etc).
>>>
>>> It is possible to ping and ssh other tenant instances from any tenant!
>>>
>>> Is this the correct behaviour for a virtualized deployement ?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Roni
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kevin Jackson
>> @itarchitectkev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20130124/470c4c7c/attachment.html>


More information about the Openstack mailing list