[Openstack] [OpenStack][Swift] Fast way of uploading 200GB of 200KB files to Swift
Chuck Thier
cthier at gmail.com
Mon Jan 14 16:43:36 UTC 2013
Using swift stat probably isn't the best way to determine cluster
performance, as those stats are updated async, and could be delayed
quite a bit as you are heavily loading the cluster. It also might be
worthwhile to use a tool like swift-bench to test your cluster to make
sure it is properly setup before loading data into the system.
--
Chuck
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Leander Bessa Beernaert
<leanderbb at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm getting around 5-6.5 GB a day of bytes written on Swift. I calculated
> this by calling "swift stat && sleep 60s && swift stat". I did some
> calculation based on those values to get to the end result.
>
> Currently I'm resetting swift with a node size of 64, since 90% of the files
> are less than 70KB in size. I think that might help.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Chuck Thier <cthier at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Leander,
>>
>> Can you post what performance you are getting? If they are all
>> sharing the same GigE network, you might also check that the links
>> aren't being saturated, as it is pretty easy to saturate pushing 200k
>> files around.
>>
>> --
>> Chuck
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Leander Bessa Beernaert
>> <leanderbb at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Well, I've fixed the node size and disabled the all the replicator and
>> > auditor processes. However, it is even slower now than it was before :/.
>> > Any
>> > suggestions?
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Leander Bessa Beernaert
>> > <leanderbb at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Ok, thanks for all the tips/help.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> Leander
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Robert van Leeuwen
>> >> <Robert.vanLeeuwen at spilgames.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Allow me to rephrase.
>> >>> > I've read somewhere (can't remember where) that it would be faster
>> >>> > to
>> >>> > upload files if they would be uploaded to separate containeres.
>> >>> > This was suggested for a standard swift installation with a certain
>> >>> > replication factor.
>> >>> > Since I'll be uploading the files with the replicators turned off,
>> >>> > does
>> >>> > it really matter if I insert a group of them in separate
>> >>> > containeres?
>> >>>
>> >>> My guess is this concerns the SQLite database load distribution.
>> >>> So yes, it still matters.
>> >>>
>> >>> Just to be clear: turning replicators off does not matter at ALL when
>> >>> putting files in a healthy cluster.
>> >>> Files will be "replicated" / put on all required nodes at the moment
>> >>> the
>> >>> put request is done.
>> >>> The put request will only give an OK when there is quorum writing the
>> >>> file (the file is stored on more than half of the required object
>> >>> nodes)
>> >>> The replicator daemons do not have anything to do with this.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> Robert
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> >>> Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>> >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> > Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>> >
>
>
More information about the Openstack
mailing list