[Openstack] Need Help
Umar Draz
unix.co at gmail.com
Thu Jan 10 03:51:09 UTC 2013
HI Stefano,
Thanks for your long help, Please take your time.
I'll wait your response
Best Regards,
Umar
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Stefano Zanella
<zanella.stefano at gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Umar,
> I'm sorry again but I'm approaching a deadline on next Tuesday, so I've
> little for anything.
> I'd like to reproduce your environment on my test system (it's not too
> distant from yours), so I can give you an accurate response.
> I'll keep you updated ASAP.
> Thanks for patience.
> Regards,
> Stefano
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Umar Draz <unix.co at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> HI Stefano,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply
>>
>> I can ping all nodes from their local IP using any virtual machine.
>>
>> 1) I have ubuntu 12.10 on all compute nodes
>> 2) I don't have any iptables on all compute nodes. Nova its self intall
>> iptables firewall
>>
>> Please find attached file as per your instructions.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Umar
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Stefano Zanella <
>> zanella.stefano at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry for the delay, it was a busy day.
>>> I'm missing a step here: are you able to ping all 3 compute nodes from a
>>> VM inside one of them, or can you ping for each VM only the corresponding
>>> node?
>>> Can you now paste the output of:
>>> ip addr list on hypervisor and VM
>>> route -n on hypervisor and VM
>>> brctl show on hypervisor
>>> iptables -L -nv on hypervisor
>>> iptables -L -nv -t nat on hypervisor
>>> (I'm trying to avoid for now to track traffic with tcpdump, but it'll be
>>> next step if we cannot find the problem this way)
>>>
>>> Do you have a standard iptables or do you have some custom rules? Also,
>>> what OS are the hypervisors running on?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Stefano
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Umar Draz <unix.co at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Stefano,
>>>>
>>>> No Luck, Still same,
>>>>
>>>> I can ping all 3 compute nodes
>>>>
>>>> 192.168.1.133
>>>> 192.168.1.134
>>>> 192.168.1.135
>>>>
>>>> from any virtual machine, but I can not ping, 192.168.1.136 another
>>>> linux machine on local network.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Umar
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Stefano Zanella <
>>>> zanella.stefano at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think there's a mismatching here between configuration and intended
>>>>> behavior, I'm sorry not to have detected it before.
>>>>> With your configuration, you're bridging (Layer 2) two different
>>>>> networks (Layer3). They cannot communicate if not properly routed or
>>>>> masqueraded.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you need to NAT VMs directly with public IPs? If not, I'd suggest
>>>>> you to change the configuration as follows:
>>>>> # NETWORK
>>>>> network_manager=nova.network.manager.FlatDHCPManager
>>>>> force_dhcp_release=True
>>>>> dhcpbridge_flagfile=/etc/nova/nova.conf
>>>>> my_ip=6x.1x.84.132
>>>>> public_interface=eth1
>>>>> flat_network_bridge=br100
>>>>> fixed_range=10.0.0.0/24
>>>>>
>>>>> This way, nova-network will setup NAT between 10.0.0.0/24 and
>>>>> 192.168.1.0/24 and you should be able to reach your LAN. Then, if you
>>>>> want to reach machines inside VMs private network, you could add a floating
>>>>> IP range and assign them to VMs.
>>>>> Hope this could solve the problem.
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Stefano
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Umar Draz <unix.co at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I did this on compute
>>>>>> root at compute1:~# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/default/rp_filter
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and the result from vm
>>>>>> root at vm:~# ping 192.168.1.134
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PING 192.168.1.134 (192.168.1.134) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>>>>> From 10.0.0.2 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>>>> From 10.0.0.2 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>>>> From 10.0.0.2 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>>>> From 10.0.0.2 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>>>> From 10.0.0.2 icmp_seq=5 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>>>> From 10.0.0.2 icmp_seq=6 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>>>> From 10.0.0.2 icmp_seq=7 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>>>> From 10.0.0.2 icmp_seq=8 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>>>> From 10.0.0.2 icmp_seq=9 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>>>> From 10.0.0.2 icmp_seq=10 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>>>> From 10.0.0.2 icmp_seq=11 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>>>> From 10.0.0.2 icmp_seq=12 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>>>> From 10.0.0.2 icmp_seq=13 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>>>> From 10.0.0.2 icmp_seq=14 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>>>> From 10.0.0.2 icmp_seq=15 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Umar
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Stefano Zanella <
>>>>>> zanella.stefano at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you try to set rp_filter to 0? I needed to disable it today,
>>>>>>> otherwise I was facing problem similar to yours.
>>>>>>> Try to ping with rp_filter disabled, let's see if we can resolve the
>>>>>>> problem that way.
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Stefano
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Umar Draz <unix.co at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here is the result
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> root at compute1:~# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>>>>>>>> 1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> root at compute1:~# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/default/rp_filter
>>>>>>>> 1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> root at compute1:~# nova secgroup-list-rules default
>>>>>>>> +-------------+-----------+---------+-----------+--------------+
>>>>>>>> | IP Protocol | From Port | To Port | IP Range | Source Group |
>>>>>>>> +-------------+-----------+---------+-----------+--------------+
>>>>>>>> | icmp | -1 | -1 | 0.0.0.0/0 | |
>>>>>>>> | tcp | 22 | 22 | 0.0.0.0/0 | |
>>>>>>>> | tcp | 80 | 80 | 0.0.0.0/0 | |
>>>>>>>> | tcp | 443 | 443 | 0.0.0.0/0 | |
>>>>>>>> | tcp | 16667 | 16667 | 0.0.0.0/0 | |
>>>>>>>> +-------------+-----------+---------+-----------+--------------+
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Umar
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Stefano Zanella <
>>>>>>>> zanella.stefano at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Routing and IP setup looks ok. What's the output of
>>>>>>>>> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/default/rp_filter
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also, did you setup security groups correctly? What's the output of
>>>>>>>>> nova secgroup-list-rules default
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You should have setup at least a rule for allowing icmp traffic.
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Stefano
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Umar Draz <unix.co at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here is the result
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Compute node
>>>>>>>>>> ------------
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *brctl show*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
>>>>>>>>>> br100 8000.002590976edb no eth1
>>>>>>>>>> vnet0
>>>>>>>>>> *ip addr list*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state
>>>>>>>>>> UNKNOWN
>>>>>>>>>> link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
>>>>>>>>>> inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
>>>>>>>>>> inet 169.254.169.254/32 scope link lo
>>>>>>>>>> inet6 ::1/128 scope host
>>>>>>>>>> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>>>>>>>>>> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq
>>>>>>>>>> state UP qlen 1000
>>>>>>>>>> link/ether 00:25:90:97:6e:da brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>>>>>>>>> inet 69.155.84.133/25 brd 85.195.84.255 scope global eth0
>>>>>>>>>> inet 69.155.84.142/32 scope global eth0
>>>>>>>>>> inet6 fe80::225:90ff:fe97:6eda/64 scope link
>>>>>>>>>> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>>>>>>>>>> 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq
>>>>>>>>>> master br100 state UP qlen 1000
>>>>>>>>>> link/ether 00:25:90:97:6e:db brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>>>>>>>>> 4: br100: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
>>>>>>>>>> noqueue state UP
>>>>>>>>>> link/ether 00:25:90:97:6e:db brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>>>>>>>>> inet 10.0.0.3/24 brd 10.0.0.255 scope global br100
>>>>>>>>>> inet 192.168.1.133/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global br100
>>>>>>>>>> inet6 fe80::225:90ff:fe97:6edb/64 scope link
>>>>>>>>>> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>>>>>>>>>> 9: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
>>>>>>>>>> pfifo_fast master br100 state UNKNOWN qlen 500
>>>>>>>>>> link/ether fe:16:3e:41:0c:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>>>>>>>>> inet6 fe80::fc16:3eff:fe41:c2a/64 scope link
>>>>>>>>>> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *route -n*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kernel IP routing table
>>>>>>>>>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric
>>>>>>>>>> Ref Use Iface
>>>>>>>>>> 0.0.0.0 69.155.84.129 0.0.0.0 UG 0
>>>>>>>>>> 0 0 eth0
>>>>>>>>>> 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0
>>>>>>>>>> 0 0 br100
>>>>>>>>>> 69.155.84.128 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.128 U 0
>>>>>>>>>> 0 0 eth1
>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0
>>>>>>>>>> 0 0 br100
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *virtual machine
>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>> *ip addr list*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state
>>>>>>>>>> UNKNOWN
>>>>>>>>>> link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
>>>>>>>>>> inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
>>>>>>>>>> inet6 ::1/128 scope host
>>>>>>>>>> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>>>>>>>>>> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
>>>>>>>>>> pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000
>>>>>>>>>> link/ether fa:16:3e:41:0c:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>>>>>>>>> inet 10.0.0.2/24 brd 10.0.0.255 scope global eth0
>>>>>>>>>> inet6 fe80::f816:3eff:fe41:c2a/64 scope link tentative
>>>>>>>>>> dadfailed
>>>>>>>>>> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *route -n*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kernel IP routing table
>>>>>>>>>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric
>>>>>>>>>> Ref Use Iface
>>>>>>>>>> 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.3 0.0.0.0 UG 100
>>>>>>>>>> 0 0 eth0
>>>>>>>>>> 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0
>>>>>>>>>> 0 0 eth0
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Umar
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Stefano Zanella <
>>>>>>>>>> zanella.stefano at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please post the output of "ip addr list", "route -n" and
>>>>>>>>>>> "brctl show" on compute node and virtual machine? More than a firewall
>>>>>>>>>>> issue, it seems a routing issue to me.
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Stefano
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Umar Draz <unix.co at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think My network configuration is ok,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I can ping compute's own ip address 192.168.1.133 from virtual
>>>>>>>>>>>> machine. But I can't access other local machines.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think its security firewall issue or need some routing table?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is the out put of ping.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> root at ubuntu-cloud# ping 192.168.1.133
>>>>>>>>>>>> PING 192.168.1.133 (192.168.1.133) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.133: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=0.225 ms
>>>>>>>>>>>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.133: icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=0.360 ms
>>>>>>>>>>>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.133: icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=0.271 ms
>>>>>>>>>>>> root at ubuntu-cloud# ping 192.168.1.130
>>>>>>>>>>>> PING 192.168.1.130 (192.168.1.130) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>>>>>>>>>>> From 10.0.0.3: icmp_seq=2 Redirect Host(New nexthop:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.1.130)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 10.0.0.3 is the gateway of virtual machine which is the ip of
>>>>>>>>>>>> compute's br100
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Umar
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Stefano Zanella <
>>>>>>>>>>>> zanella.stefano at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want to setup DHCP flat networking, maybe this page
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and the chapter that contains it) could help:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://docs.openstack.org/essex/openstack-compute/admin/content/libvirt-flat-dhcp-networking.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stefano
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Umar Draz <unix.co at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my_ip=6x.1x.84.132
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public_interface=eth0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flat_network_bridge=br100
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Umar Draz
>>>>>>>>>>>> Network Architect
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Umar Draz
>>>>>>>>>> Network Architect
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Umar Draz
>>>>>>>> Network Architect
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Umar Draz
>>>>>> Network Architect
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Umar Draz
>>>> Network Architect
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Umar Draz
>> Network Architect
>>
>
>
--
Umar Draz
Network Architect
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20130110/17d094b6/attachment.html>
More information about the Openstack
mailing list