[Openstack] Suggestions for shared-storage cluster file system
Marco CONSONNI
mcocmo62 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 18 13:20:11 UTC 2013
Hello Sam,
I've tried two of them: NFS and Gluster.
Some problems with the former (migration didn't work properly), no problem
with the latter.
I vote for Gluster.
Hope it helps,
Marco.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Samuel Winchenbach <swinchen at gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can anyone give me a recommendation for a good shared-storage cluster
> filesystem? I am running kvm-libvirt and would like to enable live
> migration.
>
> I have a number of hosts (up to 16) each with 2xTB drives. These hosts
> are also my compute/network/controller nodes.
>
> The three I am considering are:
>
> GlusterFS - I have the most experience with this, and it seems the easiest.
>
> CephFS/RADOS - Interesting because glance supports the rbd backend.
> Slightly worried because of this though "Important:
> Mount the CephFS filesystem on the client machine, not the cluster
> machine."
> (I wish it said why...) and "CephFS is not quite as stable as the block
> device and the object storage gateway."
> Lustre - A little hesitant now that Oracle is involved with it.
>
>
> If anyone has any advice, or can point out another that I should consider
> it would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Sam
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20130218/db31fd2b/attachment.html>
More information about the Openstack
mailing list