[Openstack] OpenStack and its brilliant future with IPv6 and, we don't need...
robertc at robertcollins.net
Thu Aug 8 21:31:13 UTC 2013
On 9 August 2013 07:51, Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmartinsc at gmail.com> wrote:
> 1- NAT;
There's no /need/ for it in IP4 in a lot of environments. Only public
cloud providers really need to do NAT in IP4.
> 2- Floating IPs;
Implemented via NAT, but not about NAT: they are about being able to
move endpoints instantly without dns cache issues - an HA tool, and a
well-known-address tool. The implementation is changable but the
concept is valuable in IPv6 too IMNSHO.
> 3- Use of Namespaces.
I don't see how this is related : with SDN someone can define the same
IPv6 range in two tenants, so namespaces are still needed.
Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com>
HP Converged Cloud
More information about the Openstack