Tim, It's possible that SAN appliance used to provide storage to VMs under Cinder management will need to directly plug some logical port into tenant network. In this case, it seems that it should be Quantum actually performing plug, probably through some specialized agent. -- Best regards, Oleg On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote: > ** ** > > There has been some load balancing discussion and more is due at the > summit. The various current activities are summarised in > http://wiki.openstack.org/Quantum/LBaaS**** > > ** ** > > Can you explain what you mean by storage devices with respect to Quantum ? > The storage activities are underway as part of Cinder.**** > > ** ** > > Tim**** > > ** ** > > *From:* openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern.ch at lists.launchpad.net [mailto: > openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern.ch at lists.launchpad.net] *On Behalf Of *Endre > Karlson > *Sent:* 09 September 2012 19:57 > *To:* openstack at lists.launchpad.net > *Subject:* [Openstack] Quantum -. Multi-Plugin and support for > provisioning of other devices.**** > > ** ** > > Hi, I am wondering if there are any community plans to support to use > Quantum to provision up interfaces on other devices in areas of say > LoadBalancers, Storage devices etc and if there are plans to support > multi-active plugins in Quantum for this?**** > > ** ** > > Is there a timeframe maybe?**** > > ** ** > > Endre.**** > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20120912/91cffcd4/attachment.html>