Open Stack

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Matt Joyce <matt at nycresistor.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Adam Spiers <aspiers at suse.com> wrote:
> > Doug Hellmann (doug.hellmann at dreamhost.com) wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Dean Troyer <dtroyer at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Doug Hellmann
> >> > <doug.hellmann at dreamhost.com> wrote:
> >> > > Do we need to specify this beyond saying that all subcommands must
> use
> >> > > argparse for argument parsing (the new framework depends on it
> anyway, and
> >> > > then they are all consistent)?
> >> >
> >> > We should document that, I had just assumed it until now.
> >>
> >> Agreed.
> >
> > Sorry, that made me think of another newbie question - is the
> > intention that all actions (including user- / site- / vendor-specific
> > extensions) *must* be implemented in Python using the client API
> > modules?  Or will it also be able to support extensions simply by
> > dropping arbitrary openstack-ACTION executables on $PATH?  I like the
> > way git lets you do the latter, e.g. I have a bunch of shell scripts
> > named git-something in my own ~/bin which help me extend git and
> > automate my git workflows, and they can still be invoked via `git
> > something'.  In case you're curious, here they are ...
> >
>
> That made me think of something.  Is the intention for the client to
> be portable?
>
> Defining portable as :
>
>   Easily deployed to a host
>   Minimal dependency set
>

We're going to have dependencies, in order to achieve our desired feature
set. For one thing, you'll need client packages for all of the various
services. cliff also includes a few dependencies itself for formatting
output, handling interaction, etc.


>   Cross operating system portability ( pipe dream but python is solid at
> it )
>

I don't think we're using any OS-specific tools at this point. I don't see
any reason to believe that will change.

We (I?) also have as a goal to make the tool work with Python 3 as well as
Python 2.


>
> Strikes me that having the package end up being portable would be a
> huge boon to openstack.
>
> -Matt
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20120501/caef0757/attachment.html>