Open Stack

I don't think we'll be able to dictate what our users decide host means.

But this issue isn't worth this much traffic.

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Zhongyue Luo <lzyeval at gmail.com> wrote:

> Shouldn't the options which requires hostname be *_hostname?
>
> I don't know if it's just me but "ip address" and "host" seem to be
> synonyms.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Matt Joyce <matt.joyce at cloudscaling.com>wrote:
>
>> https://review.openstack.org/9153   now as a review.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Nathanael Burton <
>> nathanael.i.burton at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> While at a minimum this is a doc bug, I would suggest we do one of the
>>> following:
>>>
>>> 1. Rename existing parameters that require the value to be an ip address
>>> such as 'metadata_host' to 'metadata_host_ip' so that it is more obvious.
>>> Make this a standard for all config parameters.
>>>
>>> 2. I agree with Lars, it would be even better if it was seamless
>>> (regardless of what was set, host or IP) and where we require IP addresses,
>>> do resolution.
>>>
>>> Nate
>>> On Jun 28, 2012 7:55 PM, "Matt Joyce" <matt.joyce at cloudscaling.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya <
>>>> vishvananda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> those are supposed to be ip addresses, so I would go with doc bug now
>>>>> unless there is a good reason to change it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Vish
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 28, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Maybe I sent this out too late at night; I think it slipped below
>>>>> > everyone's radar.  I'm interested in whether or not people think this
>>>>> > behavior is a functional bug, or maybe just a documentation bug:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> I ran into an issue earlier today where I had metadata_host set to
>>>>> the
>>>>> >> *hostname* of our controller.  This got stuffed into an iptables
>>>>> rule
>>>>> >> as...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>  -d os-controller.int.seas.harvard.edu/32
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> ...which promptly failed.  Setting this to an ip address fixed this
>>>>> >> particular error, leading me to wonder:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> - Is this expected behavior?
>>>>> >> - Should I always use ip addresses for *_host values?
>>>>> >> - Is this a bug?
>>>>> >> - Should linux_net.py resolve hostnames?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars at seas.harvard.edu>       |
>>>>> > Senior Technologist                                |
>>>>> http://ac.seas.harvard.edu/
>>>>> > Academic Computing                                 |
>>>>> http://code.seas.harvard.edu/
>>>>> > Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences |
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>>>> > Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>>>>> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>>>> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>>>> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>>> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20120628/94870097/attachment.html>