Open Stack

Perhaps a poor analogy with email - The domain is an arbitrary string that's intended for tenant isolation in large openstack environments. It's a place to hang policy so that you can delegate things like "password changing" (where the keystone backend supports it) to someone other than the keystone-uber-administrator.

I expect almost any smaller/smallish deployment of OpenStack to likely use just a single domain, which is mostly ignored. It's really a mechanism in place for service-provider sized clouds, or where you want to be able to enforce hard boundaries in permissions between groups of tenants by customizing the policy.json files to respect domain_id information.

I would expect that in any implementation, it would be independent of email domain names or such - At least that wouldn't be a way that I'd slice up permissions across projects.

-joe

On Jul 18, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
> Thanks…. My worry is the username. Currently, I have
>  
> OS_USERNAME=timbell
>  
> Not
>  
> OS_USERNAME=timbell at cern.ch
>  
> Does that mean in the future that my
>  
> OS_USERNAME=timbell
> OS_DOMAINNAME=cern.ch
>  
> I would like that I could still register as timbell in my domain even if someone else on the same OpenStack instance has a user id of timbell.
>  
> Cross domain, federated identity as part of an authorization layer would be an interesting development (as we look to federated clouds and bursting) but I didn’t see something like that in v3.
>  
> Tim
>  
> From: openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern.ch at lists.launchpad.net [mailto:openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern.ch at lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Adam Young
> Sent: 18 July 2012 17:46
> To: openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Identity API v3 - Why allow multi-tenant users?
>  
> The idea of a Domain is that it is a single administrative entity, such as a company. 
> 
> When a person joins a company,  they get an email adddress.  THat address does not change regardless of the position they hold.  
> 
> Tenants are administrative groupings below that.  It is unfortunate that we used the name tenants for this, as it actually contradicts the usual meaning of the term.  We will be shortly switching back to using the term projects, and I think that is clearer.
> 
> 
> It certainly makes sense for a user to belong to one domain, but have access to a project controlled in another domain.  Here is a scenario.  Joe's Sporting Goods and Local Bank are both companies that have a presense in a coud provider. Each has their own domain.  tom at localbank.com  is going to set up a Point of Sale system for Joe.  So Joe creates a project called joes-point-of-sale and provides access to user tom at localbank.com.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 07/18/2012 02:46 AM, Matt Joyce wrote:
> I could see service users and security / operations teams having a need to span many domains.
> 
> -Matt
> 
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
>  
> I thought that the v3 API supports domains as a group of tenants which would make the question rather different.
>  
> Thus, I guess the question is
>  
> A.      Should there be users in multiple tenants in a single domain ?
> 
> B.      Should there be users in multiple domains ?
> 
>  
> There are clear use cases for A (such as researchers working on multiple projects sharing project quotas)
>  
> For B, it is less clear as if I am a domain administrator, I do not want to be told that I cannot allocate user X since another domain has already taken it. On the other hand, there is a clear architectural benefit from having the concept of identity (and authentication) split off from roles and projects.
>  
> Tim
>  
> From: openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern.ch at lists.launchpad.net [mailto:openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern.ch at lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of John Postlethwait
> Sent: 18 July 2012 07:42
> To: Rouault, Jason (Cloud Services)
> Cc: openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> 
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Identity API v3 - Why allow multi-tenant users?
>  
> Forcing a user to remember different usernames and/or passwords for each project they are a part of, when it is possible they are part of N projects, really isn't an acceptable option in my opinion.
>  
> I believe that regardless of the engineering complexities, the end users shouldn't have to feel pain in order to make engineering the solutions and features they interact with easier. Software is for end users (in their various forms) and as such we need to take that into account when we make decisions. While no functionality is lost per se, there is a major end-user impact, and that should be reason enough to implement it…
>  
>  
> John Postlethwait
> Nebula, Inc.
> 206-999-4492
>  
> On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Rouault, Jason (Cloud Services) wrote:
> 
> One benefit is the user does not need to have multiple sets of credentials to interact with multiple projects.
>  
> Jason
>  
> From: openstack-bounces+jason.rouault=hp.com at lists.launchpad.net [mailto:openstack-bounces+jason.rouault=hp.com at lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Adam Young
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 11:55 AM
> To: openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Identity API v3 - Why allow multi-tenant users?
>  
> On 05/29/2012 01:18 PM, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
> One of the major complication I see in the API is that users can be associated with multiple tenants.
>  
> What is the benefit of this? What functionality would be lost if a human user merely had to use a different account with each tenant?
>  
> There are numerous issues with multi-tenant users. For example, if a user is associated with multiple tenants, who resets the user’s password?
>  
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> Did you ever get an answer?  This has been discussed in depth.
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20120718/50370fa2/attachment.html>